I just finished reading almost everything I could find on bowl games attendance. Bottom line is the TV appetite is what keeps most bowls alive. The camellia bowl last year drew a handful of fans, however, out rated the opening day of baseball between the Yankees and Red Sox. That just blew my mind. They do not need attendance just viewers. ESPN / Disney owns a large number of bowl games outright. They have their own network to show them on. Viewers = sponsor sales. The biggest issue is how long the colleges, having to pay for unsold tickets and bloated travel expenses, will continue to pay to have their egos stroked by going to a bowl game.
Since bowl games — at least second-tier ones not named Rose, Sugar or Orange — are not exactly financial windfalls for schools. The rewards, according to supporters, are more intrinsic — the coach has more time to hold practices with players and can talk up the bowl appearance to recruits; it’s a reward for players; and fans can mingle with other fans, possibly in a warm, sunny destination.
I guess it is safe to predict great success for the Austin bowl for the administrators and television folks. As long as their pockets are full and the colleges are willing to pay the price. Bring on the University of Phoenix and lets have a bowl game.
-
Like x 1
Last edited: May 14, 2015