Even further, the two who denied any evidence of surveillance (wiretaps) are the very ones who would be guilty of a crime if it was proven.
If the FBI had DT's campaign under surveillance, Comey would've had knowledge and be guilty of a crime. If the NSA did, Rodgers would be guilty of a crime.
It's not a stretch either of these guys would lie to protect their own arse over something that would likely never come to light unless they admitted it.
This is exactly why CIA Director Brennan lied to Congress last time. He was involved in illegally collecting data on U.S. citizens. Brennan thought there's no way the public would ever find out. So when asked he flat out lied. He only came clean after Snowden.
I have no doubt the FBI or NSA would believe they're protected and able to hide the truth if they did monitor DT's campaign.
The only ones making the claim are DT's team and half-cocked efforts by a few Reps in Congress. The MSM has zero desire. Why would intel ever believe they couldn't just deny and bury it.
To blindly accept their testimony and easily dismiss either Comey or Rogers may have just pulled a Brennan is ignoring what's at stake for those two if it is true.
-
Like x 1
Last edited: Mar 20, 2017