aggy finally crunched the numbers for aggy -- and hit itself in the face with a cold doe of reality, something the fanbase resists at all times.
If you dont know, the "Good Bull Hunting" site is supposed to be a site that proves aggy can have a sense of humor
Here is their beginning and end
"The Curse of Pretty Good
Let’s start with the obvious question. What’s the point of this piece?
… since our move to the SEC, larger and larger pieces of our fanbase have adopted a perverse, alternative, almost unsporting view of how Texas A&M Athletics should be graded. Phrases like “market reach”, “brand exposure”, and “revenue stream” are used to argue superiority, when these arguments are best served by one metric and one metric only: winning
That’s the goal of this article - to build a case for Texas A&M’s Big Three men’s programs, relative to the rest of the Power Five..........
* * *
o Let’s Recap (by whoopy)
Freaking Minnesota. Prior to this experiment, we certainly did not consider Minnesota to be anywhere near the same level as Texas A&M’s big three sports. For starters, Texas A&M Athletic Department revenue for 2017 was $211,960,034; while Minnesota’s revenue was $116,376,862. The expectations, and money, we as Aggies have is up there with programs that have won championships in one, two, or all three of these sports. The results do not match up to expectations.
History is not on Texas A&M’s side ....."
https://www.goodbullhunting.com/201...t=chorus&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
Or, as found above --