Impeachment

Discussion in 'West Mall' started by mchammer, Sep 24, 2019.

  1. I35

    I35 5,000+ Posts

    Make sure you look at the name plates and watch till the very end.

    :lmao:
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  2. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    "More than you can imagine"

     
    • Hot Hot x 1
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2019
  3. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Sharyl Attkisson notes Bill Barr has suddenly become chatty -- and tries to summarize the info dump

    "In each of two video appearances ... Attorney General William Barr provided the same basic information and views about the U.S. intelligence community’s actions against the Trump campaign in 2016 and 2017. A criminal investigation is underway and being led by U.S. Attorney John Durham.

    Barr was motivated to make the public statements, he said, by the misreporting and confusion surrounding Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report issued on Dec. 9. It found serious government surveillance abuses but no evidence of political bias on the part of the offending FBI officials and agents.

    Below are 24 points Barr felt the need to make after the release of the Horowitz report. (All of the information is attributed to Barr.)

    2. The FBI did spy on the Trump campaign. That’s what electronic surveillance is.

    4. From “day one,” the FBI investigation generated exculpatory information (tending to point to the targets’ innocence) and nothing that corroborated Russia collusion.

    5. It’s a “big deal” to use U.S. law enforcement and intelligence resources to investigate the opposing political party, and I cannot think of another recent instance in which this happened.

    7. It was “wrong” for the FBI to presume the Trump campaign was part of a plot. They should have gone to the campaign and discussed their suspicions.

    10. As to the FBI’s motive, “that’s why we have Durham.” I’m not saying the motivations were improper, but it’s premature to say they weren’t.

    12. Contrary to much reporting, Horowitz didn’t rule out improper motive; he didn’t find documentary or testimonial evidence of improper motive. Those are two different things.

    16. The wiretaps allowed the FBI to go back and capture Page’s communications, emails, and other material from weeks, months, and even years ago.

    21. Were the four Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act judges who approved the four wiretaps against Trump associate Carter Page badly misled by the FBI? Yes

    22. Are people going to be held accountable, including at the very top of our intelligence agencies and FBI? Well, they’re all gone.

    See the rest here William Barr Has Suddenly Become Chatty—and He’s Provided Quite an Information Dump
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
  4. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    "Triggered"
    lol
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
  5. horninchicago

    horninchicago 10,000+ Posts

    She tweets "WTF" but would be one of the first to say Trump's tweets are beneath the dignity of his Office. A hypocrite having been at such a high level in the Obozo admin.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2019
  6. Monahorns

    Monahorns 5,000+ Posts

    So when does this go to a vote?
     
  7. horninchicago

    horninchicago 10,000+ Posts

    I'm sure they will put on a charade of debates next week and then vote straight along the party lines.
     
  8. Horn6721

    Horn6721 10,000+ Posts

    Mona
    Supposedly next Wed on floor
     
  9. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    The committee vote is in -- Judiciary Dems approved their articles of impeachment by a 23-17 vote
    This is the 1st party line impeachment in history
    Radicals are now in full control the Democrat Party
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Here are the vulnerable Dems in Trump Districts

    [​IMG]
     
  11. horninchicago

    horninchicago 10,000+ Posts

    Guessing they would all rather sacrifice their political seats to be on the side of history that voted to remove Trump, a fruitless cause.
     
  12. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    They are probably busy trying to get as much as they can for that vote -- "I want one of those Ukraine jobs, you know, like Hunter had"
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  13. theiioftx

    theiioftx Sponsor Deputy

    The dems are taking this so seriously that their chair is falling asleep and members watching golf.

     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  14. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

  15. horninchicago

    horninchicago 10,000+ Posts

    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    • Like Like x 1
  17. theiioftx

    theiioftx Sponsor Deputy

    That should be interesting.
     
  18. Mr. Deez

    Mr. Deez Beer Prophet

    I'm surprised the Bidens didn't just give this chick a blank check once paternity was determined.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  19. horninchicago

    horninchicago 10,000+ Posts

    Why? They seem to be stupid.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  20. Horn6721

    Horn6721 10,000+ Posts

    I would guess hubris played a role. Until Trump stuff liked this had been swept under the rug. It was a Biden after all.
     
  21. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Could still happen
     
  22. Horn6721

    Horn6721 10,000+ Posts

    JF
    But if the Bidens try to buy her off now I think her attorneys would say no.
     
  23. Mr. Deez

    Mr. Deez Beer Prophet

    Has jurisdiction been established over Biden? I know the girl is from Arkansas, but my understanding is that she lived in DC at the time of the "consummation." I don't think Biden has ever been a resident of Arkansas.

    If you get it on with a chick who used to live in Arkansas, does that create "minimum contacts" with the state of Arkansas to give its courts jurisdiction over you? If so, that's pretty rough. Better make sure you stay away from chicks who have lived in Oklahoma.
     
  24. Mr. Deez

    Mr. Deez Beer Prophet

    Everybody has a price.
     
  25. horninchicago

    horninchicago 10,000+ Posts

    Go on...
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  26. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    If a man and woman from Arkansas are married in Arkansas under Arkansas law and then are later granted a divorce by an Arkansas court, are they still considered brother and sister?
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2019
  27. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    I believe he appeared already. He does have listed counsel, which implies an appearance and thus pj. And the local newspaper there said he was forced to submit to a DNA test - presumedly with some type of order entered.
     
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2019
  28. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    So people have been calling the offices of these 31 vulnerable Dems. As far as we know, not a single of of them has been willing to take a public position on impeachment - either way.
     
  29. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Yet even more happy news for the Biden family
     
  30. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

Share This Page