Protecting our 2nd Amendment Rights

I'm not litigating that these people may have been reasonably "cancelled" from your perspective. I'm just pointing out that both sides play this game. The cancel culture all over the right wing sites are things like Dr. Suess foundation not printing six of their own books.

Trump won because he fanned some of the worst flames that lie at our human core. That and a perfect storm that included a horrible opponent, foreign assistance and luck.

 

Young Pharoah said anti-Semetic remarks. That's what got him canned.

 

Not unreasonable. His QAnon conspiracy loving did not get him canned. Subjective, it is.

 

Ok, I had to look this guy up. I don't know why he's famous or anything. But in the article I found, there was this description of QAnon:

"QAnon believers think that a shadowy international child trafficking ring of Satan-worshipping Democrats, Hollywood elites and lizard-humanoids sexually abuse and torture children in order to extract an allegedly psychedelic, youth-rejuvenating chemical called adrenochrome from their victim's pituitary glands."

And this...

"Frazzledrip, a QAnon-related conspiracy theory, claims that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sexually assaulted a child, cut off the child's face and wore it as a mask before drinking the child's blood."

What we are dealing with concerning this cancel culture is the boundaries of obsession. In my view, and I'd tell anyone who asked, the QAnon and Frazzledrip people are extremists who are mentally ill. What is it that you want? CPAC did the right thing.

But that's not what we are talking about. We are talking about the Liberal army on Twitter and in the colleges who are destroying any hint of non-compliance with purist inclusion and diversity dogma.

 

Bubba, explain why the Trump tax cuts need to be reversed.

 

CNN told him so.

 

Frazzledrip. Allsome! Dude, I'm just saying both sides want to cancel the other side's things. That's all. Also, you have at least one Q poster here.

 

It does look to be just one. Btw, how many Blue Anon do we have here?

 

White House says Biden is prepared to issue executive orders on guns

"White House press secretary Jen Psaki told reporters at a briefing that she couldn’t offer an “exact time frame” on when those orders would move off Biden’s desk, but said they were “one of the levers that we can use ... to help address the prevalence of gun violence and address community safety around the country.”

We'll see what happens.

 

White House Confirms Biden Will Sign Gun Control Executive Orders | The Daily Caller

 

I will never understand how it can be possible for clueless Joe Biden to legally issue an executive order to negate anything pertaining to the constitution of the United States of America.

That is all...

 

I am assured the controls will be reasonable and not infringe on my rights. Going to a gun show this Sunday to get more ammo just in case I am incorrect.
If I was paranoid I might think Biden was an agent of the gun cartel trying to drive up prices.
Nah.

 

10% for the Big Guy...

 

Is Joe Dementia cancelling the 2nd Amendment?

 

That's Seattle Husker and OUBubba defined. The Blue Boy Group.

 

Wow. The worst huh? Man, Hillary was sure unpopular if it took only the worst of us to get her defeated. You probably meant to say our deplorable human core I’m sure.

 

I’m not 100% sure, but I’m guessing Russian collusion played a major role in Trump winning. Maybe someone should look into that.

Speaking of foreign interference, is Stumbling Mumbling Joe Dementia still supporting the Chi-com’s “custom” of slavery for their least favorite citizens?

 

I agree...Baxter out !

 

A guy with dementia is in control of the most powerful country in the world and he is managing through executive order. I’m going to send him an email of how I won the lottery in Africa. I just need his social security number so I can cash the check. I’ll smartly offer 10% for the big guy.

 

I mean he worked to trigger the worst part of us. We each have that in us. I really think newt started us down this path.

Hillary would have been a great asset during the pandemic. She was a horrible candidate.

 

Hillary would have made a lot of money for Bill during the pandemic. She was a horrible candidate though.

 

When that couple in St Louis felt threatened by rioters and they brought out their guns and told them to leave their property, it was the government that went after them. No one was hurt, no one killed, but in the eyes of the government they considered the couple criminals for trying to protect themselves. Don't tell me this isn't a constitutional right. I know the words come from the DOI but the principal rights talked about in the DOI were guaranteed by the Constitution.

 

Lol, I love it when I hear your pretty little words like "common sense". It makes you sound reasonable. I'm sure putting a frog in water that is 70 degrees is common sense to a frog until the temp is turned up higher and higher until the frog is cooked.

You see the libs don't want "common sense" gun laws they want to ban guns and this is how they walk us there. Using pretty words like "common sense". Their laws don't work, and they know it, so they turn up the heat little by little with more "common sense" until they have taken away our rights and all that is left are the criminals to do freely as they want. (See Nazi Germany).

Trump won because no one could stomach Hilary and her crap. I'd have voted for anyone over her.

I hear I can get a new kidney in China, they seem to have them laying around, just have to pick one out.

 

Do that many Americans have weapons such as tanks, armored vehicles, M119A3 105mm or 155mm towed howitzers, or Paladin 155mm self-propelled howitzers? How about aircraft like F-15 Eagles, F-15E Strike Eagles, F-16 Fighting Falcons, F-22 Raptor, or A-10's? How's for assault helecraft? A bunch of knuckleheads with automatic or semi-automatic weapons and a small collection of explosives lining up to take on the US military would not last very long. Besides, the military would dump chemicals on that group and game over. Great theory for the government to be afraid of the people, but in reality it's no contest.

 

What is the total number of troops in the U.S. military? Compare that to the total number of armed U.S. citizens. Now imagine if the U.S. military was ever forced to occupy the United States. The resistance put forth by armed American civilians would make Viet Nam and Afghanistan look like a garden party.

 

With evil like that, they need to be overthrown sooner than later.

 

Like I posted before, unless the military is on your side, trying to take over the US government would be absolutely futile.

 

It would be much easier to use a printing press and mail in voting. You may have to build a fence around the Capitol and call in a ridiculous amount of national guardsmen to protect your cheating asses from the vicious skinny jeans/starbucks crowd, but lives would be saved.