I'm not sure what comment I might make in regards to this^^^^, but I will say you shouldn't feel bad for critiquing one of our QBs, popular or not. I've noticed many people around here have a strange, and very personal, defensive response to any suggestion that the QB they love isn't perfect. The fact is, Sam was very likable, tough as nails, gave his all, and was the right representative of UT as a QB for the time in history within which he played.
He racked up stats due to the length of time he played and the style popularized and utilized during his tenure, and as a result of determination and talent....but there was plenty lacking in his game and progress.
Could he have won more with more consistent defense, better coaching, or other on the field circumstances?
Probably so...but that is true for 95% of all college QBs and in no way negates his flaws or shortcomings. These things are not mutually exclusive. Most of the positive things being said about Sam are true...but he had plenty of flaws...and, more disconcertingly, didn't seem to get markedly stronger in those particular areas.
This same group of posters who won't acknowledge any of Sam's shortcomings would go nuts if anyone criticized Shane, though he did very little on the field while here.....but was a likable team guy with a good attitude- and pedigree.
I don't get all the love is blind protection of your favored QB. It is perfectly possible to love, root for, support, encourage, and cheer for a college QB while still having eyes wide open and recognizing their shortcomings or areas they need to improve....at least it is for some of us.
Last edited: Apr 21, 2021