Since the woman writer knew of the grant and what Ebright said that means she didn't deceive anyone. The letter does prove it now that we know more of the background. The letter already proved it to everybody in the know. Watching you trying to weasel out of this is hilarious. Maybe you shouldn't have said Ebright didn't have any evidence.
By the very definition this is gain of function. This "but not blatantly gain-of-function" are weasel words. The virus was modified.
Once again time proves Husker wrong.
FAUCI LIED!
-
Like x 1
Last edited: Oct 22, 2021