Christian Persecution

Discussion in 'West Mall' started by Clean, May 7, 2019.

  1. Monahorns

    Monahorns 5,000+ Posts

    English police in those videos are obviously on the side of the demons. But, if I'm the Christian there I lie about what I am doing. The Bible applauds lying to tyrannical authority in several places.
     
  2. Facing Addiction

    Facing Addiction 1,000+ Posts

  3. guy4321

    guy4321 2,500+ Posts

    Banning prayer is bonkers and banning silent prayer is even more bonkers. But is this part true? "A court ruled only weeks ago that Isabel broke no laws by thinking a prayer in her mind."

    How would any legal authority involved miss that now?
     
  4. Mr. Deez

    Mr. Deez Beer Prophet

    There's a good chance that the actual police officer thinks this is dumb and a waste of resources. He didn't seem particularly motivated to go after this lady. As for lying, my guess is that this woman is there to pray but also to bring awareness to the absurdity of this law.
     
  5. Facing Addiction

    Facing Addiction 1,000+ Posts

    • WTF? WTF? x 1
  6. Facing Addiction

    Facing Addiction 1,000+ Posts

    Christian Street Preacher Reported to UK Counter-Terrorism Police for Preaching What Bible Says About Gender | Not the Bee

    "This case represents a disturbing trend in our society which is seeing members of the public and professionals being prosecuted and reported as potential terrorists for refusing to celebrate and approve LGBTQ ideology. The Bible teaches clearly that we are born male and female; this belief and the freedom to express it in public without fear of being arrested or reported as a terrorist to Prevent must be protected."

    [​IMG]
     
  7. guy4321

    guy4321 2,500+ Posts

    Regarding the UK, still curious if this part is true about silent prayer.

    "A court ruled only weeks ago that Isabel broke no laws by thinking a prayer in her mind."
     
  8. Mr. Deez

    Mr. Deez Beer Prophet

    They have very stupid laws here dealing with harassment that are so vague and overly broad that they can be used for blatantly ideological and partisan reasons. Very scary stuff.
     
  9. Facing Addiction

    Facing Addiction 1,000+ Posts

  10. guy4321

    guy4321 2,500+ Posts

  11. guy4321

    guy4321 2,500+ Posts

  12. Sangre Naranjada

    Sangre Naranjada 10,000+ Posts

  13. guy4321

    guy4321 2,500+ Posts

    I know what you mean and agree. You'll surely agree the not okay part is the action by the Vermont Principals’ Association.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  14. Facing Addiction

    Facing Addiction 1,000+ Posts

    • Like Like x 6
  15. Facing Addiction

    Facing Addiction 1,000+ Posts

  16. guy4321

    guy4321 2,500+ Posts

  17. Horn6721

    Horn6721 10,000+ Posts

    Surprised he would want to go back.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. guy4321

    guy4321 2,500+ Posts

    Less surprised about that. Now he can coach and pray at mid-field with high schoolers again.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  19. Horn6721

    Horn6721 10,000+ Posts

    Except Guy
    He will be watched like a hawk and the admin will have him under a microscope
     
  20. Mr. Deez

    Mr. Deez Beer Prophet

    I'll give them credit for bringing him back. It suggests that the problem wasn't the board but was obnoxious, lawsuit happy parents. f**k 'em.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  21. Horn6721

    Horn6721 10,000+ Posts

    I don't think "they" deserve credit.
    It was part of the ruling.
     
  22. Mr. Deez

    Mr. Deez Beer Prophet

    Yes, but many school boards would have bought him out to get rid of him anyway.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  23. lkainer

    lkainer 500+ Posts

    The $2M gives him some money to speak freely at work. Might be fun.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  24. guy4321

    guy4321 2,500+ Posts

  25. Horn6721

    Horn6721 10,000+ Posts

    It is interesting that the tv report and online coverages I have seen refer to shooter as "she"
     
  26. Sangre Naranjada

    Sangre Naranjada 10,000+ Posts

    Of course they do 6721. Those ******** will do everything in their power to protect the tranny brigade from the stigma of being associated with a school shooter.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  27. Mr. Deez

    Mr. Deez Beer Prophet

    It is remarkable. I've read many articles following mchammer's approach of not using pronouns to describe the shooter to avoid any connection.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  28. Horn6721

    Horn6721 10,000+ Posts

    Me too MrD
    It is like all msm follow one order.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  29. mchammer

    mchammer 10,000+ Posts

    To be clear, my approach is for personal interactions.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  30. guy4321

    guy4321 2,500+ Posts

    I've found a few using "they" for the shooter. I thought the agreement was if the transgender wanted to go by "he/she/they" that the writers had to use "he/she/they" respectively? What's up with offensively calling a "she" that wanted to be a "he" a "they"?
     

Share This Page