the hell? The Link Not only has the nappy hair been ironed out, but those glued on eyelashes? As Boehner learned, you do not want to come between Michelle and her food. She was wicked when she thought she might be forced to stop chewing.
I would have thought someone responsibile for protocol would have given her a few lessons on eating in public. I wonder if she still thinks America is downright mean
35 I can tell you are a true supporter. Her lack of table manners has nothing to do with her rudeness to Boehner.
One day, it would be fascinating to see some flame throwers here actually criticize something or someone like Jan Brewer or Dick Cheney and their inappropriate behavior to Democrats. Then we could all actually take threads like this seriously.
Guess this right wing douchebag has been spending a lot of time on this site. What's that old saying about a blind squirrel finding a nut?
good grief. this woman has the table manners of a stray dog. Look how she is all slumped over her plate and has her elbow on the table like she is gaurding her last morsels from Boehner. You'd think by now she'd know she doesn't need to gaurd against her food provided at taxpayer expense. Seeing as how she is so willing to lavish herself in our dollars. classless. simply classless just like her incompetent husband, the 6 trillion dollar street organizer. way to go america.
What do you think is the best way to fight socialism? (Not a rhetorical question) I haven't noticed any country do it effectively over the long haul other than individual initiatives of isolation or moving. Compromise slows down the transition. Capitulation speeds up the transition. But to reverse course? When people see that they can vote themselves other people's stuff, I don't see a whole lot to prevent it. Self reliance and self determination are great ideas and move countries towards greatness, but I am not sure the poor see it as an effective way to turn their individual lives around. So when the number of poor grows (which not coincidentally occurs as an economy transitions from capitalism), the number of people who believe in socialist ideas grow. The question I ask is how is the best way to fight socialism? Showing the past, that socialism doesn't work, is not an effective message to the poor. Loss of freedoms is perhaps an important and effective message to focus upon. This is how I would approach the issue with the idea of gaining support from the middle class. Thus, as long as the poor, number less than 50% of the population, non-socialists have a chance. However, they must make the middle class feel that they are part of their group and provide ideas of inspiration and hope. As a counterpart, socialists must make people feel that there is no hope. They must make people feel that the system is gamed and everyone doesn't play by the same rules. And they must add to their ranks by destroying the economy and importing poor who share their ideas. Socialists must also not fall into the same negative campaign that conservatives were accused of in the article. A message of the rich are out to get you only goes so far. They also must provide a message of hope and inspiration. Socialists must state that by government assistance and equalizing the playing field that everyone has a chance to live a fulfilling life and equaling the playing field does not equate with a loss of freedoms.
It is sad to realize that people can't recognize or care that the woman who is supposed to be ' First Lady" of our country should have enough pride to know how to eat in public but doesn't even care enough to learn .
Yo mama so fat she has to put her belt on with a boomerang. Yo mama so short she has to jump to squat.
Link? And tell the people affected by Sandy who still don't have electricity that Bush was worse. That is the standard response from you sheep. You are pathetic.