Were any of those polls from ABC? I seen (and not sure which state) that they only had 27% republicans that participated in their poll.
Wait...a campaign trying to woo the media? That's clearly insidious. Next you'll tell me that the Trump campaign meets with Fox, Brietbart and others. Oh wait...you won't because it's only a 1-sided game to you. If these reporters attended, does that make them dirty? I'm a decision maker for enterprise applications in my company. If I attend a dinner put on by a tech company that I'm interested in hearing more does that make me ethically challenged? If your job is to get the "scoop" maybe it's in their best interest to build a relationship with the campaign. This doesn't mean that some aren't dirty as we all know that the campaigns use lazy media to seed stories but I'm not sure this is the indictment the alt-right would like to think it is. It plays well for the conspiracy theorists though.
Combine that list with some of the WikiLeaks releases and it is, indeed, insidious. Some of them submitted their articles to Podesta for prior approval. This is not how a free press works. But you, like CNN, would not know this as you both refuse to look at the Wikileaks releases.
And if crowd size was indicative of election results, David Lee Roth would have been President of the United States in the '80s instead of Reagan.
Yes, a few of these individuals have been shown to be way too cozy with the Clinton camp or the DNC. So, indict those as opposed to the entire lot. That is akin to someone taking Sean Hannity's relationship with Trump (buttbuddies?) and claiming it applied to all conservative media.
LOL! Wikileaks is now a media organization. Their agenda is as clear as the one CNN adopted this cycle.
Says the guy using polling data to prove his point that the election is close. Pulse Opinion Research, CVOTER, PPP, and Reuters/Ipsos. Not that any of them are more reputable than either ABC or Monmouth, but it is 4 vs. 1.
I honestly believe Moore to be a closet Trump supporter. He'd totally blow his street cred with the hard Left to publicly back Trump, and he has gone too far Left to publicly switch to the new populist GOP. However, in the privacy of the voting booth, I guarantee you he's voting for Trump. The liberal case against Trump is centered almost entirely on identity politics, and though Moore has gone along with identity politics as a matter of obligation, it has never been what Moore is about. He has always been about the blue collar middle class that has fallen through the cracks and has been publicly supportive of pro-labor, economic nationalism. That's what he grew up around, and that's what has always motivated him. Furthermore, he has never liked the Clintons and other corporate Democrats, frankly because they screwed over and sold out people like him.
One problem you aren't mentioning is wikileaks is based on facts of dems own words when the other is trying to cover up those facts.
Arizona's latest poll by CNN just included only 20% republican and 56% democrats even though there are more republican voters in that state.
Bobama the liar Even this Clinton aides calls him out for it (internally, of course) click once to enlarge
