The Inauguration

Discussion in 'West Mall' started by Clean, Jan 20, 2017.

  1. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    This is something that does not get near enough attention. In fact, it barely gets any.
     
  2. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    You are such a misogynist pig for trying to mansplain what these ladies were protesting. They are quite capable of articulating for themselves just what it is they want to do

     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts



    [​IMG]
     
    • Like Like x 1
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2017
  4. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

  5. Clean

    Clean 5,000+ Posts

    Sounds like the Women's March was the world's largest production of The Vagina Monologues.

    Ashley Judd has lost her frickin' mind!
     
    • Like Like x 2
  6. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    I imagine a day in the future when this stuff is no longer funny
    But its not here yet

    [​IMG]
     
  7. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    [​IMG]
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

  9. iatrogenic

    iatrogenic 2,500+ Posts



    The above two posts are typical, weak arguments repeatedly used by goofy liberals.

    "everyone is oversimplifying the women's march"- This crap is stated with a sense of superiority toward those that disagree with him. Only he can understand the complexity. You are too simple. Other examples: "I don't want to get into the weeds"

    "Trump would be best not to poke the bear by defunding planned parenthood"- In other words, and disregarding facts, "you will suffer if you disagree with me, the all knowing liberal"

    You'd have to disregard the multitude of sexual harassment claims against him, the Billy Bush tape, the comments on the Howard Stern show, the treatment of Carly Fiorina and others to believe that he doesn't have a misogynistic view of women. Ivanka Trump is one of the only arguments against this and in this case you can clearly see that family trumps other views. ."- the liberal can take anecdotal incidents that favor his arguments and extrapolate them to the universe, but the repeated actions of Trump hiring women and supporting his daughter that counter the lib's argument are either ignored or relegated to a "one-off', family related situation. Ignoring facts are a favorite tactic of liberals. For instance, what happened to all of the women that made unfounded sexual harassment claims against Trump at the end of the Presidential campaign? They disappeared as soon as Trump said he was going to sue them. Has a court found Trump guilty of sexual harassment? No, but that doesn't stop the liberal from making the "all or nothing" argument that every thought Trump has about all women involves prejudice and that he will sexually harass all women.

    -In this case all facts concerning the specifics of the women's soccer team's complaints are ignored, as are the wholly disingenuous claims concerning a lack of "women's rights" existing somewhere in the U.S., or that women's rights are being denied. Top off that tactic with "your a misogynist because you don't agree with my views", despite the fact that his views are baseless and illegitimate. Buried in the lib's argument is the implication that he is for women's rights and you are not.

     
    • Like Like x 2
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2017
  10. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Update on coming indictments --

    "WASHINGTON (ABC7) — A grand jury in the Superior Court of D.C. returned a superseding indictment in the Inauguration Day felony rioting case Thursday, the U.S. Attorney's Office of D.C. reports.

    The indictment adds additional charges and provides more details on the events that took place in the District on January 20.

    Approximately 212 people face felony charges, which includes one count of inciting or urging a riot, one count of engaging in a riot, one count of conspiracy to riot and five counts of destruction of property, the indictment states.

    Additional charges have been added to some of the defendants cases, including destruction of property involving damage to a limousine. ..."


    http://wjla.com/news/local/grand-ju...tment-in-inauguration-day-felony-rioting-case


    [​IMG]
     
    • Like Like x 1
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2017
  11. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    A guilty plea for "Florida man" - 6 years possible

    "....Dane Powell, 31, of Tampa was the first to enter a guilty plea on felony charges brought against 212 protesters accused of rioting and vandalizing property during the Jan. 20 melee surrounding President Trump’s swearing-in ceremony.

    Scheduled to be sentenced July 7, he faces a possible six years in prison for breaking windows and throwing a “brick, large rock or piece of concrete” at officers after joining a mob of masked black bloc protesters who moved en masse across 16 blocks in about 30 minutes, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/apr/28/dane-powell-black-bloc-protester-pleads-guilty-to-/

     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Said the woman with the wooden sign


    [​IMG]
     
  13. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    The first trial of the inauguration arrests is getting ready to begin. This one involves 7 people, one of whom is a amateur 'journalist' who broadcasts part of it on FB. Each of them is charged with 5 felony destruction of property charges and a felony riot-incitement charge that carry up to 10 years in prison each. Plus misdemeanor charges of rioting and conspiracy to riot (180 days each). If convicted, actual sentences can be and likely would be less time.

    There were more than 230 arrests total, including other media types, after marchers smashed coffee-shop, restaurant, hotel, vehicle, bus stop, bank windows and lit a limo on fire. 19 of them plead to misdemeanors. But 200 still face charges that carry a maximum of 61 years in prison. One of the more interesting aspects of this is some of the media were let go with no charges (NBC and US News & World Report) while others were charged.

    Civil lawsuits are ready to fly as well, if there are acquittals. The ACLU is ready to go. But convictions will probably result in a lot of subsequent plea deals.

    It will be an interesting trial as the prosecution theory seems to be conspiracy rather than direct property damage.
     

Share This Page