I agree their conclusions are more probable than not.
Everything about this shoddy investigation has been amateur hour. If someone hacked into our defense systems or power grid, the following investigation would look nothing like this. That tells us everything about their intent to shape a narrative.
Allowing the DNC servers to only be inspected by Crowdstrike gives the intel community plausible deniability if their bogus conclusions are exposed as a fraud.
In today's hacking world only an incompetent hacker would leave fingerprints showing origin and not leave behind others to confuse and point to other origins.
The CIA Vault 7 exposure was a 'how-to' manual on doing this very thing and has been accessible to hackers for a while.
No doubt they already have software programs to run code through that will translate in multiple deceiving signatures.
I do believe Russia tried to interfere with our elections, just like China and Iran surely tried as well. Same way we run these sabotage attempts towards our adversaries.
But blaming all this hacking on Russia because of code signatures, keeping much of the proof hidden, and allowing Crowdstrike conclusions has all the signs of a set-up.
Not to mention the elephant in the room. The Pakistani IT thieves had classified access to these very networks for years and were being paid millions.
Last edited: Jul 25, 2017