First, I didn't use the "Dems do it too" defense, so I guess I'm not wrong.
Second, Russians or Chinese or Namibians openly helping and supporting (legally or illegally) one party in the U.S. doesn't magically translate into a crime being committed by the party receiving support, which is what the Dems are saying. Clearly, the Russians want to destroy NATO, and they were motivated to jump on the Trump train because Trump was criticizing NATO. It's just not hard to figure this out folks.
Third, the investigators are doing their job. In addition to Trump, should they also investigate everyone that supported Trump because they thought they would benefit from Trump being President? After all, those voters had motive and some would benefit from a Trump presidency by millions of dollars. Maybe one if the people that voted for Trump hacked Podesta, or colluded with the Russians to hack Podesta. If motive is the argument in support of an investigation because candidate x won a Presidential election, this investigation could take a couple hundred years. We have 50 million + possible criminals to investigate. Billions of dollars were at stake in the election because Trump campaigned on lowering taxes while the Dems campaigned on... uh... hell, I guess they only campaigned on saying Trump sucked, but they damn sure don't want to lower taxes.
Putin is a murderer. I've never heard Trump say he was a good guy. I have heard Trump say he was a better leader than Obama, which is arguably true.
Last edited: Jul 27, 2017