And if people would just limit it to that, I'd be ok with it. The very legitimate objection I have is when people infer these silly and frivolous notions that somehow that offensive philosophy is in anyway in the same league as the spread, which is what's dominating the sport from the top down. Unlike the dinosaurs that furiously masturbate over that falderal, I don't need to parrot empty rhetoric like Anakin Skywalker's inane and inarticulate promos about the Dark Side of the Force which were spoon fed to him by demagogues like Sheev Palpatine. I don't need to resort to that because the data is right in front of us. It speaks for itself. I mean seriously, some of you read exactly like the Shawn character in Bad Teacher.
The pro style does not possess unlimited power, it doesn't scare anyone with a shred of common sense that knows it can be beaten silly, and its methods are absolutely dwarfed by certain others. The fact that some either don't like it or they don't like the way people like myself say it doesn't in any way mitigate the fact that it's happening just the same.
Regarding the fact that Texas scored 10 in regulation, there's absolutely no tangible reason whatsoever to believe that they'd have fared anywhere remotely better with that Michigan system. In fact the available evidence overwhelmingly suggests they'd have fared considerably worse. If there were evidence to the contrary, I'd be willing to read/listen, but using the word "power" as an entire sentence (like "Denny Crane") isn't evidence.
Last edited: Sep 18, 2017