I am advocating that the NFL should have made a good business decision by not offending large segments of their customer base. I would have thought the same if it was a guy wearing a "Blue Lives Matter" hat during the anthem as a form of counter-protest.
Why is it not applicable? The NFL has chosen to restrict their player's freedom of expression because there was a good business reason (lucrative licensing deal) to do so. For some bizarre reason, the NFL did not think there was a good enough business reason to restrict these inflammatory protests. I think they have finally realized that they made a huge mistake. I will be surprised if these protests are still allowed in another season or two. The bleeding will be too much.
Last edited: Aug 14, 2018