I have been struggling with a way to properly articulate my issue on this part. It has to do with their oath of office --
“I, ___ ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as ___ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”
28 USCode §453 - Oaths of justices and judges
I take the position that if you go into this role with the idea that you are going to re-write the Constitution, treat is as merely "advisory," or simply ignore the parts that you disagree with, then your oath is invalid on its face which immediately disqualifies you from the office. I havent yet figured out the best way to make this argument, but I am working on it.