GOP now has the opportunity to provide scientific data that refutes the purported consensus. but what do we hear? ….crickets.
I haven't seen or heard of any new studies that are refuting the claims by the Global CC crowd. It's the same old tactic. "your numbers are extrapolations. They COULD BE wrong in a hundred ways".
That is a valid argument, but lets see the science from the other side that says it isn't a thing. Let's see all these scientist and their papers that say there isn't a GCC problem. Let them take their turn on the podium and have their work scrutinized.
I'm a willing audience for both claims.
Baed on what I've heard so far, I believe there is a CO2 problem, I believe we are the producers of sufficient quantities to tip the scales and bring on problems or provide solutions. I believe the volume of support and evidence is enough to warrant taking substantive steps to reduce our impact.
I realize they are using estimates and forecasting that is heavily reliant on being an honest broker. But I know that EVERY big decision about the future is predicated on estimates and forecasting and just because you don't have 100% fidelity doesn't mean you don't take prudent steps based on the information you have.
Again, where is the science and documentation to support the GOPs position??
Click to expand...