The First 100 days

As for "Getting Trump," it is what it is... if they have direct proof of the latest allegation then we have to accept it and allow the process to unfold. It is frustrating because it is quite clear they never accepted the results of the election. They also ignored Obama's failures concerning the hacks along with Hillary's reckless use of her servers. I pray to God sometimes that the hypocrisy will end but it never will. The modern day Ultra-Liberals don't strike me as lovers of America and our Constitution. They are all about power and they are ruthless in their use of PCness and intimidation to achieve mind control.

I believe that.

But if Trump directed his attorney to lie then I that's what he did and I'm willing to accept whatever the proper consequence may be.

 

If true, he broke the law. And Republicans won’t do anything.

 

If he broke the law then I truly hope the evidence is clear so we can have a clean outcome.

My cynicism about the Left is driven by many things. Just today I saw how Gladys Knight of the Pips is being ripped for accepting the invitation to perform at the halftime of the Super Bowl. They are saying she is not supportive of BLM and Colin Kaepernick. This is too much. It's militant activism that is over the top and there is a cancer in America and I believe AOC, Maxine Waters and Feinstein to be waving that flag. I cringe at the thought of them being fully in power.

 

Come on, Deez. Now you're talking about something that won't happen very often. Besides, the person with the rope will more than likely be spotted.

What's this private civil action you're talking about?

 

Oh yeah cuz Dems are so much better at policing their side. Sheesh.

Lee Corso: Not so fast, my friend:

Live Blog | January 18, 2019 12:35:05

 

It's barely started and the two reporters are already contradicting themselves.

 

Wait. So Buzzfeed reported on a story for which they hadn't seen any of the evidence they claimed to exist?

At this point the gotcha for today's media is for those who believe the stories, not for Trump supporters.

Also, at this point do you think LongestHorn will show any self-awareness about how many times he has been wrong? Or will he continue to try to post his "gotcha" articles?

 

You can put Husker in the same boat. He's been wrong so many times but still won't admit to how many times the media has lied to him.

 

Looks like the reporters of this story have a history of falsehoods, mental illness, and drug use, but I’m sure it’s a legit representation.

 

I've admitted when I'm wrong, a unique behavior on this board.

 

Not really the point I'm making. You keep falling for fake news then claim fake news is a Trump/right wing canard. Maybe this time you'll get lucky and it'll be real but I've seen a shitload of "we've got Trump now" stuff that turned out to be bogus.

 

You keep claiming fake news without any evidence. It's almost as if "I don't like that news so I'm call it fake." That's what Trump does.

Take the Trump positions as an example...
1. There was no contacts with Russians from my campaign.
2. After the Sessions meeting, Flynn meetings and Trump Tower revelation it became...but there was no collusion...Witch hunt.
3. Now after Manafort's direct interaction with the Russians, including exchanging polling data and Cohen's revelations on the Moscow Trump Tower negotiations' timing...

That latest resulted in the revelation from Guiliani that he stated that Trump's campaign didn't collude but only that Trump himself didn't collude. Of course, he absolutely stated that the Trump campaign didn't collude in June/July last year.

 

SH
Sometimes lately you have admitted error. That is to your credit. Good on you.
But you also have disappeared when someone calls you on backing up something .

 

The media pumps out anti-Trump story after story and you and Longesthorn report it here with bated breath. The next day the corrections to the story come out and then the story dies. Rinse and repeat. You did see the corrections to that Manafort-Russia collusion story you put up last week, right?

 

Remember when all the libs thought Michael Cohen to be a credible, believable, likable guy when he was Trump's lawyer?

Me neither. Now they hang on every word he says. Gee, do you think there is something in it for him?

 

What makes this story different is that supposedly the FBI has documents to back up Cohen's statement. It's probably garbage but we'll see.

 

Got any links , Iatrogenic?

 

I don't think he's credible...but then again neither is Trump. In a battle of credibility I'll declare it a draw, at best.

 

The FBI has a lot of motivation to prove trump did something after all the Strzok texts and the dirty dossier. Smells fishy to me.

 

Quite the contrary - they seem to believe that the Constitution has outlived its usefulness. They view it as a block to their progressive agenda.

 

Chris Wallace of Fox News does not strike me as the biggest Trump fan and even he thinks this whole Cohen thing is needing to be taken "with a huge block of salt".

I am shocked and uphauled to hear you don't think Trump is more credible than Cohen.

 

I've admitted being duped by fake Tweets... twice... at least I have that going for me.

 

Well, if I'm correct in my characterization then your point is not contrary; it is an extension.

 

After the attachment to Stormy Daniels and her attorney, both now relegated to the dust-bin of historical irrelevancy, it seems the Left continues to act like a drunk man at closing time, looking into the eyes of a female, any female, regardless of her physical qualities to satiate his burning desire.

The accusation is not only guilt; it feeds the dark clouds like the evaporation process; no lakes, seas or oceans; then no cloud.

 

Breaking news on Fox right now. Mueller team debunks Buzzfeed report. Mueller Team!

 

Yep. After Bruce Ohr's testimony we've discovered the DOJ/FBI is even dirtier than what we thought.

 

"A previous version of this article misidentified the people to whom Paul Manafort wanted a Russian associate to send polling data. Mr. Manafort wanted the data sent to two Ukrainian oligarchs, Serhiy Lyovochkin and Rinat Akhmetov, not to Oleg V. Deripaska."

Big deal. What's your point? Entrapment?

 

mueller-team-disputes-buzzfeed-report-claiming-trump-told-cohen-to-lie

 

Did you read the part where nearly all the polling data that Manafort sent was publicly available already and that the few things that weren't available was released a few weeks later? Even if it wasn't publicly available polling data isn't considered classified info. Fake news.