3rd and 17

Discussion in 'On The Field' started by Longbomb, Sep 7, 2019.

  1. Longbomb

    Longbomb 500+ Posts

    That play was the ballgame.

    If we hold them to 16 yards or less on that play, we probably have a 75%+ chance to win the game considering how unstoppable the offense was in the 2nd half.

    The defense we called on that play was unconscionable.

    We basically blitzed 6, had a safety creep up to cover short throws, and then had 4 DBs just play straight man-to-man on the 4 receivers that went out on patterns.

    I'm not against bringing some pressure to try to force an early throw, but you have to have 2 safeties near the first down line, with eyes on the QB, to make a play on the ball. The ball traveled about 20 yards in the air on that play...plenty of time for a 2 deep safety to run to the ball and try to make a play virtually anywhere on the field. With the defense we ran (4 guys man up, with eyes on the receiver and not the qb), if just 1 of the 4 DBs gets beat, then its a converted 1st down...and that's exactly what happened.

    I still can not believe that happened. 3rd and 17, ball completed 18 yards downfield in the air, wide open receiver, and the pass wasn't contested at all at the point of completion. The fact that the ball can travel that far in the air and there was no one able to even try to make a play on the ball is unbelievable. Huge coaching mistake IMO.

    It was a good game. The LSU QB played a great game. The LSU receivers toasted our guys all over the place. Our offense played a good game as well. And even though our D got torched overall, on that final LSU possesion they stiffened up enough to force a 3rd and 17. That should be virtually impossible to convert. It's really a bummer that we didn't get a better defensive strategy on that play.
     
    • Agree Agree x 6
    • Like Like x 2
    • Winner Winner x 2
  2. mchammer

    mchammer 10,000+ Posts

    A lot of plays went LSU way, including the onside kick. Also, the Offense forced passes in 2nd quarter instead of trying to run and keep pressure off Sam. Net result was the last possession for LSU that went for a TD
     
  3. Creek

    Creek 1,000+ Posts

    3rd and 17 you don't bring the house.
     
    • Agree Agree x 7
    • Like Like x 1
  4. Monahorns

    Monahorns 10,000+ Posts

    Tod Orlando should be fired for that call. It was lost the game.

    If you think Gundy isn't paying attention. Just wait. OSU will have something special for us not even going to mention Lincoln Riley.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. horninchicago

    horninchicago 10,000+ Posts

    Gundy, OU, TCU. They are all salivating.
     
    • Hot Hot x 1
  6. VYFan

    VYFan 2,500+ Posts

    All of us at the game said the same thing--why blitz there? Makes no sense at all. Just tackle them short of 16 yards.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  7. wadster

    wadster 5,000+ Posts

    Orlando == Diaz part deuce. Hopefully he learns from this. Being stubborn is a bad characteristic of a coach.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. horninchicago

    horninchicago 10,000+ Posts

    Oh darn, it sounds like you are agreeing now with negative thoughts. You must possess a low IQ, or so I was told for posting negative comments.
     
  9. Htown77

    Htown77 5,000+ Posts

    Did we ever stop LSU without blitzing though? I remember an LSU touchdown where we dropped 7-8 in a confined space and they just stood there doing nothing in no man's land. Blitzing was better than those guys standing around in zone coverage nowhere near the open LSU receivers.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  10. 2003TexasGrad

    2003TexasGrad Son of a Motherless Goat

    Yeah but Burrow also made a great throw under pressure. Both Herman and Orlando went aggressive and they got burned. Oh well. Sucks but LSU was up for it.
     
  11. Htown77

    Htown77 5,000+ Posts

    The bigger problem is that fact that we drop 8 and it is meaningless. The secondary needs vast improvement. Blitzing 6 should not be your best option. The bodies back there have to improve and cover better.

    We are going to have shootouts with Okie State, OU and Baylor :(
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  12. horninchicago

    horninchicago 10,000+ Posts

    Sounds like you just have a low IQ. :D
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • poop poop x 1
  13. BallsofSteerToo

    BallsofSteerToo 100+ Posts

    Actually, it sounds like you have the low IQ Chicago.
     
  14. Statalyzer

    Statalyzer 10,000+ Posts

    In hindsight, more than 75%, since we did in fact go right down and score on the next possession. Shows how far our defense has fallen: in 2005 we make the stop on 4th and 2, in 2019 we can't make the stop on 3rd and 17.

    Since we had done such a good job of that all game?

    Nope. Bringing extra guys and hoping they got to Burrow before he hit the open guy was about the only way we ever did anything positive on LSU passing plays.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  15. horninchicago

    horninchicago 10,000+ Posts

    Even with my low IQ, I can detect a rude comment.
     
    Last edited: Sep 8, 2019
  16. wadster

    wadster 5,000+ Posts

    Difference is it was 3rd and 17, not 3rd and 7. That's just a huge difference.
     
  17. SabreHorn

    SabreHorn 10,000+ Posts

    It was a stupid **** call. Orlando needs two courses in football defense:

    1) How to disguise your defense

    2) How & when to blitz

    One of the best ever is an hour South in Blanco. I have Bill Bradley's phone number when Herman decides he wants a great defense. Mack Brown had to hire Dick Tomey to get a quality defense. Herman needs to contract with Bill to fix ours.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  18. dukesteer

    dukesteer 5,000+ Posts

    I get that the Cowboy formation wasn’t stellar last night, but with 3rd and 17 and 8 DBs, I like our chance of holding Burrows to 16 yards or less. After all, that was the goal, “prevent a first down and force a punt.” We had a sack on 2nd. Bringing 6 with one creeping up seemed like a terrible call to me. It just wasn’t necessary given the down and distance.

    One more point. Has anyone else noticed that Caden Sterns doesn’t quite seem to be the player he was last year?
     
  19. AC

    AC 2,500+ Posts

    Yes I noticed he missed some tackles. I have been assuming Orlando would coach up the defense and they would improve. That happened in 17’ and 18’.
     
  20. horninchicago

    horninchicago 10,000+ Posts

    Herman proudly stated at his first Monday presser prior to La Tech that the team has bought in to the physicality and methods and culture. Why we are still missing tackles is mind boggling, really.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  21. MajesticII

    MajesticII 1,000+ Posts

    I think they are teaching alligator tackling again... SMDH...recipe for missed tackles.
     
  22. WorsterMan

    WorsterMan SEC here we come!!

    Just watched the replay of the game. Agree. That 3rd & 17 was sadly, the play of the game.

    Yeah, and Cesspool Herbstreit is just awful.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2019
  23. dukesteer

    dukesteer 5,000+ Posts

    Regarding Herbie, can’t stand the guy. Not objective. A “know it all.” Loves the SEC. Hates Texas.

    Probably a pipe dream but I wonder if CDC could request that ABC/ESPN put someone else on the Texas broadcasts when their “A” team is assigned. Think about it. This guy called the program and fans a “cesspool.” CDC would certainly have justification to make the request.
     
  24. n64ra

    n64ra 1,000+ Posts

    Worst play call of the game. Tom was asked in the press conference after the game 'why'. His answer was like 'we wanted to get the QB or prevent them from completing a pass'. Huh? Who care's if they get ten yards!? Just not 17 or more!
     
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  25. horninchicago

    horninchicago 10,000+ Posts

    I finally read the game thread. Seemed to be a lot of complaints about not sending enough of a pass rush during the game. Was the problem that we blitzed or that LSU did a good job picking it up while Burrow stepped up in the pocket and made the throw?

    Not trying to pile on Sterns, but if he doesn't get burned and either knocks down the pass or immediately is in position to make the tackle, are we talking about the blitz? Or, he gets burned like he did and makes the tackle, are we talking about the blitz?

    Texas sacked Burrow on the previous play. TH said they felt it was the right call at the time. Hell, the defense had momentum right there. After the game he said they were trying to give the offense the best field position possible after a punt by LSU.

    LSU executed against the blitz better than Texas did performing the blitz and defending the pass.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  26. horninchicago

    horninchicago 10,000+ Posts

    What had Texas's secondary done most of the night to show that had Texas dropped 8 in coverage, Burrow still wouldn't find an open receiver for the first down? Disrupting and getting pressure to him was the right call, IMHO.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  27. SabreHorn

    SabreHorn 10,000+ Posts

    How about disguising the defense and/or showing Burrow some looks he hasn't seen or isn't expecting?
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  28. mchammer

    mchammer 10,000+ Posts

    The Ossai interception call would have been a good one.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  29. Walking Boss

    Walking Boss 2,500+ Posts

    If they get 10, they go for it on fourth and 7 (they were not going to punt in that situation). Think we would have stopped them on a fourth and 7? I don't.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  30. Statalyzer

    Statalyzer 10,000+ Posts

    I don't think they'd have gone for it on 4th and 7, but probably on 4th and short.
     
    • Disagree Disagree x 1

Share This Page