Are the Pats At It Again?

Discussion in 'On The Field' started by stanhin, Dec 9, 2019.

  1. stanhin

    stanhin 5,000+ Posts

    Last edited: Dec 9, 2019
  2. mb227

    mb227 de Plorable

    Why would ANYONE need to spy against the Bengals? Really, a ONE-WIN team? They couldn't even knock off Cleveland this weekend...
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. n64ra

    n64ra 1,000+ Posts

    Why would you have to spy on the Bengals? They're 1-12. Worst team in the league!
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. El Sapo

    El Sapo Bevo's BFF

  5. rick mueller

    rick mueller Burnt Orange Bleeder

    If indeed they were doing something they shouldn't at the Bengals' game, they are likely doing the same with every team.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  6. BevoJoe

    BevoJoe 10,000+ Posts

    Doesn't make sense. Why would they film a team whose total number of wins can be counted on one finger?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. WorsterMan

    WorsterMan SEC here we come!!

    Lbs. of air in footballs, spy on other teams...

    Pats remind me of Switzer / ou in the old daze. Just win baby, cheat, spy, whatever it takes.... if you get caught deny, obfuscate, try to beat the rap.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2019
  8. stanhin

    stanhin 5,000+ Posts

  9. rick mueller

    rick mueller Burnt Orange Bleeder

    The point is, if they are doing that to teams with one win, what do you suppose they are doing to better teams? The Patriots track record speaks for itself.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. X Misn Tx

    X Misn Tx 2,500+ Posts

    i'm not saying they were cheating. but "why against the bengals?" cheaters cheat. it's what they do.
     
  11. Pomspoms

    Pomspoms 5,000+ Posts

    I guess they're guilty then.
     
  12. Statalyzer

    Statalyzer 10,000+ Posts

    Yep. Nixon didn't need Watergate either, but he continued to do what was in his nature.
     
  13. BevoJoe

    BevoJoe 10,000+ Posts

    You are correct and this issue involving the Bengals has the potential to be merely the tip of the iceberg. So, if the league is involved or this gets into a courtroom, subpoenas and other court orders may (the word "may" dose not equate to "will") find other physical evidence of a widespread practice by the Pats. At that point, anything as far as a penalty is possible, but not necessarily probable. It's going to be interesting to follow and see how this plays out.

    My comment was one of surprise, that a powerful team like the Pats would find it necessary to engage in such activities involving a cellar-dweller team like the Bengals, which they should easily steamroll. They have game film of opponents, so why go make a "documentary" on them or any team? If the allegations of spying are proven true, then the activity is or was totally senseless on the Pat's part. I'll wait for the production of evidence and not rely on the sensationalism of mere news/sports reporters.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  14. ViperHorn

    ViperHorn 10,000+ Posts

  15. Seattle Husker

    Seattle Husker 10,000+ Posts

    Except the Astros.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  16. n64ra

    n64ra 1,000+ Posts

    Or Yankees.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1

Share This Page