'I Feel Duped on Climate Change'

Discussion in 'West Mall' started by Namewithheld, Feb 9, 2012.

  1. bystander

    bystander 10,000+ Posts

    I remember seeing the photo and wondering if he knew something about climate change. I mean, he's an insider right? Surely he wouldn't buy something so close to the edge of doom.
     
  2. BrntOrngStmpeDe

    BrntOrngStmpeDe 1,000+ Posts

    could not agree more. especially as it relates to a highly complex system like climate. I personally think there is enough evidence (not yet "proof") that CC is happening that we should invest some money into substantial conservation efforts and even in alternative fuels and batteries, but we certainly don't have "proof" or even overwhelming evidence yet. And even if you have overwhelming evidence of CC you still need big evidence that your actions can do anything to impact it. We don't have that, so it is not settled science. However, many other things that are not settled science get attention, funding and action plans. That is where we should be right now. Not acting like it isn't real, but also not acting like we absolutely have all the answers and need to dismantle everything carbon in the next 2 decades.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Monahorns

    Monahorns 10,000+ Posts

    Any negative effects of CC should be addressed by technology and economic progress. Batteries, solar, wind are big wastes of money. Make energy less expensive and continue to build wealth via capitalism.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  4. Horn6721

    Horn6721 10,000+ Posts

    I read an interesting article on the stupidity of anyone who thinks solar/electric cars are a current solution or even part of the solution
    Solar panels don't work at night.
    Or on cloudy rainy snowy days
    The panels are mostly made in China using massive coal plants.
    The amount of co2 it takes to make one is far more than they save in use
    Their peak efficiency is 3_4 hrs a day and that degrades every year of use.
    They have a lifespan of up to 25 years. What will be done with the millions and millions of used panels with their toxic chemicals
    Panels toxic chemicals leach into ground during use.

    Electric cars, How much energy does it take to produce a battery?
    How long does a battery last? What happens to old batteries.
    How much electricity will be needed to charge large numbers at night?
    Where is the capacity going to come from to charge all these cars ?
    Think of an average apartment/condo complex. Think of how many will drive home from work and plug their cars in.

    Of course new technologies will help with time to perfect
    But Calif with its' mandate of no gas powered machines including generators after 2024 is a classic example of short sightednness.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
    Last edited: Oct 25, 2021
  5. Sangre Naranjada

    Sangre Naranjada 10,000+ Posts

    If you are not pro nuke, you are not serious about looming energy problems.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 2
  6. Horn6721

    Horn6721 10,000+ Posts

    Exactly
    But enough won't learn
     
  7. mchammer

    mchammer 10,000+ Posts

     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Hot Hot x 1
  8. EDT

    EDT 1,000+ Posts

    [​IMG]
     
    • Winner Winner x 5
    • Like Like x 1
  9. BrntOrngStmpeDe

    BrntOrngStmpeDe 1,000+ Posts

    The biggest problem with your argument is that most of this is based on "right now..." thinking. If we judged every technology by how it performed in its nascent phases then we would not have developed most of the crap we have today. Most of these technologies are not yet ready for full scale deployment but they have all advanced a great deal in the last 20 years. I'm of the opinion that nuclear should be about 50% of our mix with other renewables at about 25% and gas plants still in play to handle the other 25% and surges in demand. That mix is not easily achieved and would likely require a 20 year ramp to get it all situated in the right mix and geographies but it would make us resilient in ways that we are not now.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. BrntOrngStmpeDe

    BrntOrngStmpeDe 1,000+ Posts

    One other thing that should be a greater talking point in all of this us conservation. Right now residences account for about 22% of energy use. I donated some money and followed a Veteran home build in DFW. The energy footprint of that home is microscopic compared to my own home. It took additional focus and effort to do all the insulation and such but it reduced their consumption by about 90%. We could probably find 12-15% just through conservation.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. Horn6721

    Horn6721 10,000+ Posts

    BOSE
    If you read my post I clearly state technologies will evolve to move in that direction.
    But to force it now will cause more problems than help.
    What was done in that construction was a good logical evolution that construction has always taken..
    Thank you for doing that.

    I haven't seen any plans or ideas on what to do with worn out solar panels or EVO batteries.
    Shouldn't that be part of the push to use these?
     
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2021
  12. bystander

    bystander 10,000+ Posts

    A for instance would be this; is it required to cover every roof top with panels that are worse than without for us to evolve technologically? We know the problems. Should we pause until such time as the problems are mitigated?

    But that would run counter to a political goal and the money flow.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  13. mchammer

    mchammer 10,000+ Posts

     
    • Funny Funny x 4
  14. mchammer

    mchammer 10,000+ Posts

    What’s the word for laughing and barfing a little in your mouth at the same time?

     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  15. Horn6721

    Horn6721 10,000+ Posts

    "Larfing"
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Hot Hot x 1
  16. bystander

    bystander 10,000+ Posts

    • WTF? WTF? x 1
  17. mchammer

    mchammer 10,000+ Posts

    Progressives are insane.

     
    • Like Like x 4
    • Winner Winner x 1
  18. mchammer

    mchammer 10,000+ Posts

     
    • WTF? WTF? x 4
    • poop poop x 1
  19. Duck Dodgers

    Duck Dodgers 1,000+ Posts

    Everyone’s least favorite woke scold, G Theunberg, is attending the conference of
    the rich and famous in Scotland. I wonder what non-plane she used to get there -
    I’m guessing a ship rowed by galley slaves, but whipped with locally sourced, organic Cat of 9 Tails.

    No word yet if she’s going to have a meeting with Depends. If she does, I’d advise her to look into a historical European invention beforehand - the Chastity belt!

    Otherwise, Biden will try to finger rape her like the did his poor staffer, Tara Reade. If you see Slow Joe coming out of their meeting with a dull(er than usual) look on his face, smelling and licking his finger, you know she didn’t use proper precautions when meeting with a pervert.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • WTF? WTF? x 1
    Last edited: Nov 2, 2021
  20. Monahorns

    Monahorns 10,000+ Posts

     
    • Like Like x 2
  21. Monahorns

    Monahorns 10,000+ Posts

     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  22. Monahorns

    Monahorns 10,000+ Posts

  23. mchammer

    mchammer 10,000+ Posts

     
    • WTF? WTF? x 1
  24. humahuma

    humahuma 1,000+ Posts

    OAN Newsroom
    UPDATED 10:07 AM PT – Wednesday, November 3, 2021

    Republican lawmakers are requesting information on carbon emissions used to transport government officials to the COP26 summit in Glasgow.

    In a letter to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) on Tuesday, Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA), along with two others, said Joe Biden and 13 members of his cabinet used jets to travel to the Glasgow climate summit. The lawmakers said Democrat officials also used extensive motorcades to travel around the town while visiting.

    Republicans said this shows the hypocrisy of Democrat officials trying to restrict travel for everyone else due to so-called climate change, but enjoying carbon-based transportation themselves.

    Republican senators are now asking the GAO to calculate the “total amount of carbon emissions” resulting from Biden’s travel to the Glasgo’ summit.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  25. Statalyzer

    Statalyzer 10,000+ Posts

    Hallam was right about the problems that would be facing Europe, he just guessed wrong regarding the source of those problems....
     
  26. Duck Dodgers

    Duck Dodgers 1,000+ Posts

    Well it is Europe, so a gang of boys breaking into your home is a deadly situation.

    Thankfully here in the USA, it would be an opportunity, in the bleak foodless scenario he envisions, to stock up the smokehouse with some fresh long pork - the other white meat!
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  27. bystander

    bystander 10,000+ Posts

    • Agree Agree x 1
  28. nashhorn

    nashhorn 5,000+ Posts

    The truest statement at the conference but in a much more sinister way than intended.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  29. Duck Dodgers

    Duck Dodgers 1,000+ Posts

    If surrounding the car of a Senator who's vote you need to pass your bill doesn't change his mind - nothing will!

     
    • WTF? WTF? x 4
  30. lkainer

    lkainer 500+ Posts


    Great clip....really like this guy.
     

Share This Page