they're trying to do the "most aggrieved status" math in their heads. protestor 1:"uhmmm, he's black, we can't say he has 'white privilege'.... " protestor 2: "can we say he just 'doesn't understand' ? Protestor 1: "somebody call the DEI hotline...check the DEI/ESG chart....what get's more points? black man or women's 'health'? There has to be a flow chart for this sort of thing"
Wow, the San Antonio Express has changed Scott Adams' Dilbert cartoon, and have made the black guy a white guy like all the others. I have always know the paper leaned hard left, but this is plain wrong. If they want to censor Adams, don't print the strip while it is on this topic. It seems highly unethical to change an artist's work to fit a narrative.
The SA Express, Houston Chronicle, and Dallas Morning News are all turning into the New York Times and Washington Post. Ultimately, the journalism practice has become fully politicized and corrupted.
Not hypocritical. Marxism doesn’t require poverty. Marx promised that if we adopted his system, planned economies would make us all rich. The Marxist leaders are just a little ahead of the curve. (The idea that Marxism meant all the people would be poor together is a relatively recent concept, arrived at after a few decades of trying Communism).
Hypocrisy and grift often go hand-in-hand. And we know how well the BLM idiots play the grift game... But also always remember...if not for the double standards, the left would have NO standards at all.
Obviously, this BLM fraud is a liar, but can we please stop going to people's homes? It's so self-righteous and stupid. Whatever point you're trying to make is ruined by the fact that you acted like a total jackass.
People definitely shouldn't go to protest, but it's tacky to confront anyone you don't know at his home. If someone I didn't know just showed up to my house to give me crap about something, I'd tell him to eff off and slam the door in his face. She didn't and the BLM lady is obviously a lying sack of ****. However, I think Owens is out of line to even show up. She's not a criminal for it like the SCOTUS protestors are, but she's still out of line.
So the news is telling us the FBI can ID hundreds of people from photos on Jan 6 but can't ID one from these protests to charge?
They do know that if white fans didn't go to be entertained, those black players wouldn't make anywhere near the money, right?
Other true headlines could be "Black fans were entertained by White athletes a day after a racist killed Black people in Buffalo" or "Black and White fans were entertained by Black athletes a day after a racist shot White people in Buffalo".