Yet more Afghan Civilians killed by US

Discussion in 'West Mall' started by Horn6721, Feb 21, 2009.

  1. Horn6721

    Horn6721 10,000+ Posts

    But hey we sent a General to investigate, just to show our love so it is all good.
    The Link
    KABUL – U.S. military airstrikes in western Afghanistan killed 13 Afghan civilians and only three militants, the U.S. said Saturday, three days after an American general traveled to the site to investigate.
     
  2. 4th&5

    4th&5 1,000+ Posts

    War is hell. If this disturbs you then you would have really been disgusted with the military in WWII.
     
  3. Shark4

    Shark4 2,500+ Posts


     
  4. BurntOrangeOnly

    BurntOrangeOnly 500+ Posts

    Damn!!!

    Go Shark go!
     
  5. 4th&5

    4th&5 1,000+ Posts


     
  6. Horn6721

    Horn6721 10,000+ Posts

    4th and 5th
    absolutely War is hell.
    I am just wondering how many civilians can be killed before we hear the get out of Afghanastan crowd.
    Apparently 13 dead innocents aren't enough to trigger it
     
  7. fiftylarge

    fiftylarge 25+ Posts


     
  8. Namewithheld

    Namewithheld 2,500+ Posts


     
  9. Shark4

    Shark4 2,500+ Posts


     
  10. Uninformed

    Uninformed 5,000+ Posts

    Horn6721, I don't think you will hear it from the left because they would look silly going back on their campaign rhetoric of "If we weren't in Iraq, we could be in Afghanistan". We will stay until Obama can claim that he got Osama and then we will leave. I hope we get him soon though because I don't see the point in losing more US lives and spending more US dollars in a battle with no mission. Surely, we aren't going to spend trillions to build Afghanistan from scratch when there are more friendly countries like Mexico which could use our help and are more directly related to our economic and social prosperity. And as most military personnel would agree, killing Osama is much easier with drones and special ops than it is with troop massings and sovereignty threats to Afghanistan and Pakistan.
     
  11. jameson_bond

    jameson_bond 500+ Posts


     
  12. Horn6721

    Horn6721 10,000+ Posts

    jameson
    the USA has always honored its military dead. If you really cared enough about the subject to have researched it you'd know.
    does your post mean you are ok with killing innocent civilians?
     
  13. Shark4

    Shark4 2,500+ Posts


     
  14. FondrenRoad

    FondrenRoad 1,000+ Posts


     
  15. Shark4

    Shark4 2,500+ Posts


     
  16. FondrenRoad

    FondrenRoad 1,000+ Posts

    CNN

    AP

    AP has an archive search. There are a number of hits. Feel free to purchase any of those articles. They aren't free, and I'm not going to run disparate searches just for you. I linked a CNN article for you as well with the exact parameters you are looking for. Is CNN liberal enough for you? I believe they are in the axis of media evil.

    Good that you hold US soldiers to the same standards as terrorists. Its okay if we do it. They do it, so we can too. Nice logic.

    Good thing the military doesn't think like you. From the original article from that pesky liberal media:


     
  17. Shark4

    Shark4 2,500+ Posts


     
  18. Ag with kids

    Ag with kids 2,500+ Posts


     
  19. jameson_bond

    jameson_bond 500+ Posts


     
  20. Woland

    Woland 500+ Posts

    Problem is, military victories (and collateral damage) are but a small part of this war.
     
  21. Orange&White

    Orange&White 1,000+ Posts

    Only from the left can you equate "Honoring Our Dead" with putting their caskets on the news.

    Just because you don't get to watch it, doesn't mean they are not doing it.

    Just admit that you don't give a **** who is in the coffin as much as you want to make a political statement.
     
  22. jameson_bond

    jameson_bond 500+ Posts


     
  23. Horn6721

    Horn6721 10,000+ Posts

    jameson
    We'd be quite interested to read Your definition of honoring our fallen military. Please explain what you'd do to honor them.
     
  24. Shark4

    Shark4 2,500+ Posts


     
  25. danthehorn

    danthehorn 250+ Posts


     
  26. FondrenRoad

    FondrenRoad 1,000+ Posts


     
  27. Shark4

    Shark4 2,500+ Posts

    Here's the opening of my original post:

    The smallest editorial in journalism..."only."

    It begs the question of the AP, if 13 "militants" and 13 civilians had been killed would "only" be applied? How about 26 "militants" and 3 civilians? What proportion of dead "militants" vs. dead civilians is necessary to write a story without the editorial comment "only?"

    I don't know why I'm wasting my time on someone who wants to argue a point I'm not making.


     
  28. FondrenRoad

    FondrenRoad 1,000+ Posts


     
  29. jameson_bond

    jameson_bond 500+ Posts


     
  30. Shark4

    Shark4 2,500+ Posts


     

Share This Page