And this allegation (which seems credible) coupled with Moore's admission that he dated teenage girls when he was in his 30s should be enough for people not to support Moore. People need to work on their consistency. If this allegation was made about Bill Clinton, how would we react? Would we give Bill the benefit of the doubt? I wouldn't, so how could I give Moore the benefit of the doubt after the guy admits to dating and kissing teenage girls? Sorry, it may be legal to date teenage girls if you aren't having sex with them, but it sure as hell is weird and disturbing. Of course, liberals need some consistency too. They give Leigh Corfman credibility and accept her story without question, but most of them never took Juanita Broaddrick's allegations seriously. They were largely dismissed as "not credible" (without much explanation) and too old (even though they were half as old as Leigh Corfman's). 99 percent of the time, these sorts of claims (including Broaddrick's and Corfman's) are swearing matches - he said, she said. If you believe one and dismiss the other, it's probably because of politics rather than a true outrage of sexual assault.