So Ronan Farrow has a new book coming out and in it he describes how Hillary pressured him not to print the Harvey Weinstein story Anyone surprised?
Can you imagine a football coach that just lost 35 to 14 but claiming he won the game because his team had more first down? Welcome to Hillary’s world.
But my team had more yards, time of possessions, first downs, and penetrations to the red zone. But you threw a pick 6 every time you crossed the 20 yard line.
The State Department has completed its internal investigation into Hillary while at State for her use of private email. 588 violations were found 38 people could face criminal charges 91 cases of sending classified information in messages that ended up in Clinton's personal email But Barr has been in a "decline to prosecute" mood, so dont expect too much
Hillary supporters are apparently also watchers of "Dancing With the Stars" (in case you were wondering who kept this show on the air). Still sad over the election results, they really hate that Sean Spicer hasnt been kicked off yet
Well, my wife watches and she was and is no Hillary supporter. Ironically, she was telling me about this earlier. I said I'll bet liberals will say it's Russians who are calling in to vote, an obvious joke. Guess it wasn't a joke after all. Predictable.
Clinton Advisor: ‘Hillary Is Running; Feels She Was Put On Earth To Be President’ Long Time Clinton Advisor: ‘Hillary Is Running; Feels She Was Put On Earth To Be President’
They are coming for the 1st Amendment. And if Hillary had won, as the erstwhile thread-starter surmised, we would be well on our way right now. Can you imagine if Hillary had been the one to pick all these federal judges? One thing we know from the hacked emails and various law review articles, is they that were making plans to re-shape or re-write the Constitution to suit their wants and needs. It still shocks me that some of the posters here who think of themselves as conservatives and/or Republicans were willing to just sit back and let that happen. The writer here is former State Dept policy guy (an important position)
I don't get the Washington Post's logic hear. From there sub-headline: free speech undermines free speech, but somehow restricting speech somehow gives us more free speech?
