[q]U.S. attorney spokesman Josh Eaton now says that the reference in Thursday's government court filing regarding Bonds testing positive was actually referring to a November 2000 test that was previously disclosed in the indictment of Bonds and had already been reported. [/q] So, he tested positive in 2000? or no?
I think that this is a Cream & Clear thing. (It's not "Flaxseed oil"?) How can they report this so quickly, but Reggie Bush stuff is swept under the rug?
Makes sense for Bonds to test positive in 2000 before he switched to the Balco stuff they couldn't test for but which we all know he used due to the paper trail.
