Concur...I've also known some who used them back in the day where you had to go into a storefront (think World Loans or Security Finance). They got this set of pages just like any other loan agreement that showed what was due, when it was due and how much the loan would cost. Some got embarrassed by the calls in the days before the payment was due, but they viewed it as an unwritten cost...but they knew it was still better than having their accounts go negative due to a bounced check.
IMO, no. The gov't should NOT be meddling in such matters. Micromanaging the free market is simply not good practice. Next thing you will see claims being made that a business needs to cut back on dividends and channel those funds to the economically distressed. Government action to limit the amount of profit a company makes, no matter whether private or public, is a bad thing...common sense should be enough to drive someone to think about whether a loan makes sense. But then again, legislation like this is designed to ultimately move forward with the universal income crap...
Sounds like the equivalent to the Schumer box that appears with credit cards. You ever look at the statement and see also the box that tells you how long it will take to pay off the balance if you only make the minimum payment and how much it will cost you. Also included is what you need to pay if you wanted the balance gone in three years...
Sadly, that information is often overlooked by too many consumers because they remain woefully unable to curb spending and view credit cards as a bank account. Loans and cards are tools that serve a valuable purpose to those that understand the need being filled or know how to play the games...but card bonus whoring is a whole 'nother subject LOL!
Click to expand...