And this is the same garbage that Facui is trying to push - getting into arcane discussion as to what the NIH itself considers gain of function, so that their St. Fauci can't be nailed for lying to Congress about it. It's the same trick Clinton pulled when he lied under oath about - depends on what your definition of is is.
And totally coincidently, the NIH scrubbed their website for what gain of function meant, and substituted a new definition of it. We've always been at war with Wuhan!
Good write up here of how Fauci is adding in extra wording to gain of function, creating the brand new phrase "gain of function of concern", which means that it's a designed bioweapon. So as long as it can be plausibly denied that China made a bioweapon, instead of just making a new virus that's much more letha to humans, he's in the clear.
The slippery semantics of Anthony Fauci - The Spectator World
The facts are clear - Fauci funded research that made the coronavirus more contagious by combining the virus with human aspects so the virus could more readily infect human cells. He and his gas huffers will spend a week or so trying to say that's not what happened - then will more evidence comes out, they'll pull out the "we didn't know the Wuhan lab was doing that - they lied to us and we're a victim as much as anyone (besides the 600k Americans that died from it)."
Here's a good summary of how stupid you'd have to be to still believe the Wuhan started when someone ate a bat:
COVID-19 Natural Spillover Theory: How Many Coincidences Does It Require? | National Review
Last edited: Oct 26, 2021