Talk about a weird case getting weirder. We all knew that Canseco said that Roger never attended the party but he also refutes other testimony by McNamee and claims that the Mitchell Report never called him or asked him to collaborate any of McNamee's story.
Ok, so Canseco says Roger never discussed it with him or asked him for steroids or HGH. So what? What does that prove? Just because Roger never discussed it with Canseco, it doesn't mean that he never used. Quite honestly... is anyone surprised that Roger might not have felt that Canseco was someone that he could confide in? In this case, I think that the testimony of Pettitte - a teammate and workout partner - probably has more credibility here.
The key on this coder, is that the basis of McNamee's story is that party and Canseco, as well as others claim he was not there. Canseco also refutes other parts of McNamee's story. Pettitte is the key witness, but he his only dart at Roger is that Roger said something about HGH 10 years ago, then that would be far from what any of us would have expected to be the nail. Pettitte worked out with Roger everyday and this was the only time it was mentioned? I expect we will here a lot more of this testimony tomorrow, but it appears that Pettitte has not given the death nail to Clemens by any stretch of the imagination.
