https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...sible-russia-election-tampering-idUSKCN1G526N That's a 3000 to 1 ratio. No wonder the government is over $20 trillion in debt.
Where does your $200K fit into this? That must be considered part of the normal propaganda budget rather than part of any alleged election interference.
Not sure if you understand the math. $100,000 of ads vs $3,000,000 to combat their effect. The US media spends millions on propaganda. Have you listened to CNN lately?
Are the Dems also demanding that, at the same time, the US stop the disinformation campaigns we employ abroad? If not, why not?
Obama's arrogance here is pretty bad. And nothing but crickets on the Left about his failures as the hacks occurred on his watch.
Big time and that sound bite was met with cheers from the Left. It's pretty sick how they ignore this debate, the hacks themselves on his watch and the fact that whatever we found out was evidence that Hillary is a liar which we already knew.
There was no “hack.” The democrat files were downloaded on a thumb drive. Muellar has failed (intentionally) to interview William Binney, Assange, Kim Dotcom, or anyone with the technical knowledge that would blow the hack narrative out of the water. Seth Rich?
Even worst than all that, the available evidence to date points to his direct and active participation in an effort by Dems to subvert democracy in the 2016 election. What they did was much more sinister than the weak effort of "the Russians."
I understand the math. I'm just giving you a hard time about it like I always do. Fortunately, I haven't.