DNC Leadership:Israel Hating, Jew Hating, America Hating Muslim Named Deputy Chair

Discussion in 'West Mall' started by iatrogenic, Feb 26, 2017.

  1. iatrogenic

    iatrogenic 2,500+ Posts

    Tom Perez, successor to crooked Donna Brazile, names Keith Ellison Hakim (aka Keith X Hakim, Keith Ellison, Keith Hakim- Mohammed) Deputy Chairman of DNC.

    The President offered Perez a backhanded compliment via Twitter shortly after his win.
    “Congratulations to Thomas Perez, who has just been named Chairman of the DNC. I could not be happier for him, or for the Republican Party!” Trump wrote.


    http://www.weeklystandard.com/louis-farrakhans-brfirst-congressman/article/13892#!http://www.adl.org/press-center/pre...-about-Rep-Ellisons-ability.html#.WLLj7Kwiyhd

    Rep. Ellison’s remarks are both deeply disturbing and disqualifying. His words imply that U.S. foreign policy is based on religiously or national origin-based special interests rather than simply on America’s best interests. Additionally, whether intentional or not, his words raise the specter of age-old stereotypes about Jewish control of our government, a poisonous myth that may persist in parts of the world where intolerance thrives, but that has no place in open societies like the U.S. These comments sharply contrast with the Democratic National Committee platform position, which states: “A strong and secure Israel is vital to the United States because we share overarching strategic interests and the common values of democracy, equality, tolerance, and pluralism.”

    Keith Ellison Hakim: "the Constitution is a white racist conspiracy to subjugate other peoples."

    Maybe Ellision, the great supporter of Israel and interfaith dialogue, can enlighten us about his activism on behalf of Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam; his support for Kwame Ture (Stokely Carmichael) to speak at his law school on the subject “Zionism: Imperialism, White Supremacy or Both?”; or, in more recent times, his support for Sami al-Arian, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad leader convicted for conspiring to support terrorism. Maybe Ellison, the great believer in peaceful resolution of conflict, can address his support for convicted cop-killers (including leading one courthouse demonstration with the chant of “We don’t get no justice, you don’t get no peace”), and for the “flying imams” who terrified the passengers and crew of a U.S.Airways flight in 2006. Maybe Ellison, the great believer in religious tolerance, can explain why he recently berated Dr. Zuhdi Jasser — an authentic Muslim moderate who opposes Islamist groups like CAIR who flock to Ellison – for being a traitor who licenses anti-Muslim bigotry.

    http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/194947/

    Ellison's record also includes a multitude of embarrassments of the traditional kind. He fell afoul of the IRS after failing to pay $25,000 in income taxes; he ignored fines that he had incurred for parking tickets and moving violations so numerous that his driver's license was suspended more times than he can remember; he was fined for willful violation of Minnesota's campaign finance reporting law. It amounts to a striking pattern of lawbreaking since he undertook the practice of law in 1990.

    But it was the link to the Nation of Islam that stood as the most serious impediment to Ellison's primary campaign. He addressed it in a letter to the local chapter of the Jewish Community Relations Council following his endorsement by the DFL in May. In the letter, Ellison asserted that his involvement with the Nation of Islam had been limited to an 18-month period around the time of the Million Man March in 1995, that he had been unfamiliar with the Nation of Islam's anti-Semitic views during his involvement with the group, and that he himself had never expressed such views. The Star Tribune has faithfully parroted these assertions as facts.

    As a result, the three assertions have become the cornerstone of Ellison's campaign, securing him the support of prominent Minneapolis Jews and the endorsement of the Minneapolis-based American Jewish World newsweekly. Nevertheless, a little research reveals each one of them to be demonstrably false. Ellison's activities on behalf of the Nation of Islam continued well beyond any 18-month period, he was familiar with the Nation of Islam's anti-Semitic views, and he himself mouthed those views.

    Ellison was born Catholic in Detroit. He states that he converted to Islam as an undergraduate at Wayne State University. As a third-year student at the University of Minnesota Law School in 1989-90, he wrote two columns for the Minnesota Daily under the name "Keith Hakim." In the first, Ellison refers to "Minister Louis Farrakhan," defends Nation of Islam spokesman Khalid Abdul Muhammad, and speaks in the voice of a Nation of Islam advocate. In the second, "Hakim" demands reparations for slavery and throws in a demand for an optional separate homeland for American blacks. In February 1990, Ellison participated in sponsoring Kwame Ture (Stokely Carmichael) to speak at the law school on the subject "Zionism: Imperialism, White Supremacy or Both?" Jewish law students met personally with Ellison and appealed to him not to sponsor the speech at the law school; he rejected their appeal, and, as anticipated, Ture gave a notoriously anti-Semitic speech.

    Ellison admits that he worked on behalf of the Nation of Islam in 1995. At a rally for the Million Man March held at the University of Minnesota, Ellison appeared onstage with Khalid Abdul Muhammad, who ran true to form: According to a contemporaneous Star Tribune article, "If words were swords, the chests of Jews, gays and whites would be pierced."

    Even in 1995, Ellison's work on behalf of the Nation of Islam extended well beyond his promotion of the Million Man March. That year, he dutifully spouted the Farrakhan line when Qubilah Shabazz, the daughter of Malcolm X, was indicted for conspiring to murder Farrakhan. Ellison organized a march on the U.S. attorney's office in Minneapolis demanding that Shabazz be released and alleging that the FBI itself had conspired to kill Farrakhan. In a November 6, 1995, column for the Minneapolis periodical Insight News, Ellison wrote under the name "Keith X Ellison." He condemned a Star Tribune editorial cartoon that was critical of Farrakhan as a role model for blacks because of his anti-Semitism. Ellison argued to the contrary.

    Then, in February 1997, Ellison appeared as a local spokesman for the Nation of Islam with the last name "Muhammad." He spoke at a public hearing in connection with a controversy involving Joanne Jackson of the Minnesota Initiative Against Racism (MIAR). Jackson was alleged to have said, "Jews are among the most racist white people I know." Jackson denied making the statement or insisted that it had been taken out of context. Ellison appeared before the MIAR on behalf of the Nation of Islam in defense of Jackson's alleged statement. According to the Star Tribune and the full text of the statement published in the Minneapolis Spokesman-Recorder, Elli son said:

    We stand by the truth contained in the remarks attributed to [Ms. Jackson], and by her right to express her views without sanction. Here is why we support Ms. Jackson: She is correct about Minister Farrakhan. He is not a racist. He is also not an anti-Semite. Minister Farrakhan is a tireless public servant of Black people, who constantly teaches self-reliance and self-examination to the Black community. . . . Also, it is absolutely true that merchants in Black areas generally treat Black customers badly.
    The last sentence alluded to another of Jackson's alleged statements, providing a personal basis for characterizing Jews as "the most racist white people" she knew. Ellison's May 28 letter acknowledges only that others supported Jackson's alleged statement in that controversy while falsely denying that he himself did so.

    Ellison first emerged as a candidate for public office in 1998, when he ran for the DFL nomination for state representative as "Keith Ellison-Muhammad." In a contemporaneous article on his candidacy in the Insight News, Ellison is reported still defending Louis Farrakhan:

    Anticipating possible criticism for his NOI affiliation, Ellison-Muhammad says he is aware that not everyone appreciates what the Nation does and feels there is a propaganda war being launched against its leader, Minister Louis Farrakhan.
    Ellison says now that he broke with the Nation of Islam when "it became clear to me that their message of empowerment intertwined with more negative messages." However, Ellison himself was the purveyor of the Nation of Islam's noxious party line in his every public utterance touching on related issues over the course of a decade. Moreover, Ellison's unsavory associations were not limited to the Nation of Islam.

    Perhaps the lowest moment in Minneapolis's history was the September 1992 execution-style murder of police officer Jerry Haaf. Haaf was shot in the back as he took a coffee break at a restaurant in south Minneapolis. The murder was a gang hit performed by four members of the city's Vice Lords gang. The leader of the Vice Lords was Sharif Willis, a convicted murderer who had been released from prison and who sought respectability as a responsible gang leader from gullible municipal authorities while operating a gang front called United for Peace.

    The four Vice Lords members who murdered Haaf met and planned the murder at Willis's house. Two witnesses at the trial of one of the men convicted of Haaf's murder implicated Willis in the planning. Willis was never charged; law enforcement authorities said they lacked sufficient evidence to convict him.

    Within a month of Haaf's murder, Ellison appeared with Willis supporting the United for Peace gang front. In October 1992, Ellison helped organize a demonstration against Minneapolis police that included United for Peace. "The main point of our rally is to support United for Peace [in its fight against] the campaign of slander the police federation has been waging," said Ellison.

    Willis was the last speaker at the demonstration. According to a contemporaneous report in the St. Paul Pioneer Press, Willis told the crowd that Minneapolis police were experiencing the same fear from young black men that blacks had felt from police for many years. "If the police have some fear, I understand that fear," Willis said. "We seem to have an overabundance of bad police. . . . [W]e're going to get rid of them," Willis said. "They've got to go." The Pioneer Press account concludes with Ellison's contribution to the demonstration: "Ellison told the crowd that the police union is systematically frightening whites in order to get more police officers hired. That way, Ellison said, the union can increase its power base."

    Ellison publicly supported the Haaf murder defendants. In February 1993, he spoke at a demonstration for one of them during his trial. Ellison led the crowd assembled at the courthouse in a chant that was ominous in the context of Haaf's cold-blooded murder: "We don't get no justice, you don't get no peace." Ellison's working relationship with Sharif Willis came to an end in February 1995, when Willis was convicted in federal court on several counts of drug and gun-related crimes and sent back to prison for 20 years.

    The various themes of Ellison's public commitments and associations all came together in a February 2000 speech he gave at a fundraising event sponsored by the Minnesota chapter of the far-left National Lawyers Guild, on whose steering committee he had served. The event was a fundraiser for former Symbionese Liberation Army member Kathleen Soliah after her apprehension in St. Paul (under the name "Sara Jane Olson") for the attempted murder of Los Angeles police officers in 1975.

    Ellison weirdly referred to Soliah/ Olson as a "black gang member" (she is white) and thus a victim of government persecution. He described her as one of those who had been "fighting for freedom in the '60s and '70s" and called for her release. (She subsequently pleaded guilty to charges in Los Angeles and to an additional murder charge in Sacramento; she is serving time in California.) Still toeing the Nation of Islam line, he recalled "Qubilah Shabazz, the daughter of Malcolm X, [who] was prosecuted in retribution against Minister Farrakhan." He also spoke favorably of cop killers Mumia Abu-Jamal and Assata Shakur. (Shakur has been on the lam in Cuba since 1984; last year she was placed on the FBI's domestic terrorists list with a one million dollar reward for her capture.)

    Having spoken out over many years as an advocate of the Nation of Islam under guises including Keith Hakim, Keith X Ellison, and Keith Ellison-Muhammad, Ellison might reasonably prompt Fifth District voters to wonder where he really stands. His recent account of the nature and extent of his relationship with the Nation of Islam cannot be squared with the public record. During his congressional campaign, Ellison has nevertheless held himself out as a friend of the Jewish people and of Israel. As if to shore up his identity as a Muslim activist, the executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, Nihad Awad, flew to Minneapolis to appear as a featured guest (along with Ellison himself and Guantánamo chaplain James Yee) at an Ellison fundraiser in suburban Minneapolis on August 25. Awad is notable, among other things, for his past expressions of support for Hamas.

    Scott W. Johnson is a Minneapolis attorney and a contributor to the Power Line blog.

     
    Last edited: Feb 26, 2017
  2. Brad Austin

    Brad Austin 2,500+ Posts

    It baffles me how people aren't figuring out the modern Dem party has fully become anti-American radicals.

    Obama spent the last 8 years cuckholding America to enable Muslim nations and staffed many high positions with Muslims. Among many other Muslim-friendly examples with ties to radical Muslim groups.

    The feminists have joined with Muslims (even radicals) and proudly wear headscarves in the ultimate irony of warped, clueless minds.

    Then there's Ellison who is openly radical and anti-American.

    How many more signs do moderate, sensible Democrats need to realize their organization has morphed into anti-American, freedom hating, fanatics and bail.

    If the Dems held the Presidency and both houses of Congress, America would be Germany in 4 years. Well, actually it would be in or near civil war by then...guaranteed.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Clean

    Clean 5,000+ Posts

    Thomas Perez is about as far left as you can get. He's a radical in his own right. Thus Trump's congrats to the Republicans. The NYTimes had a column last week telling the Dems to "go left young man, go left" and that's what they've done.
     
  4. Phil Elliott

    Phil Elliott 2,500+ Posts

    Clap-clap-clappity-clap.
     
  5. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    This woman is running for the House in Mass

    [​IMG]
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. Phil Elliott

    Phil Elliott 2,500+ Posts

    If she gets elected, Maxine Watters and SJL are gonna have some competition for dumbest legislator.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  7. iatrogenic

    iatrogenic 2,500+ Posts

    She didn't even mention the possible devastation that could be unleashed on the dairy industry from a corporation mining cheese from the moon, or by abducting the cow that jumps over the moon as it floats in lunar orbit.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. ProdigalHorn

    ProdigalHorn 10,000+ Posts

    Plus if corporations landed on the moon, they could see right into your yard from way up there. And they could threaten to block out the sun if we don't all become their slaves.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. Mr. Deez

    Mr. Deez Beer Prophet

    And she is a weird looking chick.

    [​IMG]
     
  10. iatrogenic

    iatrogenic 2,500+ Posts

    It is worth noting that none of this board's liberals have even made an attempt to justify Keith X Hakim's views given his new position at the DNC, especially after all the nonsense they spewed concerning the supposed Trump/Bannon anti-Semitic positions. In the Keith Ellison X Hakim Muhammad case we have a real-life, died in the wool, verifiable Jew hater, and not a peep of ridicule is heard. Obviously, anti-Semitism is only to be invoked against Republicans. Such bigotry and hate is cool if the Dems are spewing such vitriol. The question then becomes; If Jews won't stand up for themselves in the face of hate coming from the Democrats, will others that actually care start to dismiss their complaints of anti-Semitism when expressed by others?
     
    • Like Like x 3
  11. Brad Austin

    Brad Austin 2,500+ Posts

    This capitulation plus other new standard operating procedures of the modern radical Dem party signal it's nearing cult and/or mental disorder territory.

    I recently talked to an ex gf who moved from Houston to San Diego. She's artsy and stays away from politics. She told me it's whacked out over there and people constantly ask your political stances.

    She said saying you aren't into politics is not acceptable. Either you're against the atrocities of DT and Reps or you're the enemy. Her new CA bf left her claiming he couldn't be with someone so blind to the threat they face.

    I mean really, one truly has to be brainwashed or morally bankrupt if they oppose Kate's Law and deporting criminal illegals convicted of a serious crime.

    Even further, the absurd and numerous hypocrisies suggest legit mental disorder...
    - Verbally attacking Jews/known Jew proponents by calling them Fascist Nazis
    - Fighting supposed fascism by violently shutting down free speech
    - Feminists joining forces with Muslims and wearing the head scarf (symbol of inequality)

    The list goes on and on. These people have really lost it.

    I often disagree with far-right politicians, but at least can logically digest where they're coming from and why. The new far left is beyond sane, logical comprehension.
     
    Last edited: Feb 28, 2017
  12. Clean

    Clean 5,000+ Posts

    I saw a blurb on NPR about a high school band from Minnesota that won't play any music composed by white composers.

    http://www.dailywire.com/news/13631/school-band-wont-use-music-white-composers-robert-kraychik

    This kind of thing is becoming common place. Nobody even blinks an eye anymore. Anti-white racism is not only not illegal it's de rigueur.
     
  13. Mr. Deez

    Mr. Deez Beer Prophet

    I don't know if this is a good thing or bad, but this whole discussion is chick code for "I want to reunite with you."
     
    • Like Like x 2
  14. Brad Austin

    Brad Austin 2,500+ Posts

    Nah, she's just cool and really honest person. We mutually agreed friends was best route long ago and rarely lived in the same city. Of course we did the deed on a few occasions since over the years and no awkwardness followed. :smile1:
     
  15. Mr. Deez

    Mr. Deez Beer Prophet

    I just took a big whiff, and I can smell the BS over a very odoriferous beer and from 7 time zones away. lol

    And be careful with the "familiarity sex with the ex." There's always a price to pay for that. If you have a bad case of "booty blindness," the price tag will be too blurry for you to see it, but it's there and you'll be held to it. Furthermore, it doesn't matter how honest she is. The price tag transcends all of that.

    And by the way, I don't judge you and have absolutely no room to do so. Ten years ago, I was stupid enough to date an Aggie - drove a maroon car, had Aggie crap all over her house, busted my balls for being a Longhorn even though I didn't go to UT (going to a UT-system school was enough in her view), wanted me to propose to her under some stupid Aggie tree, etc. Based on his own experience dating an Aggie in the past, TxStHorn said to me, "You won't listen to me and I don't blame you, but Aggie women are crazy, and you will eventually admit to me that this was a mistake." Within a matter of months, I had to swallow my dignity and admit that he was completely right. Likewise, when your booty blindness wears off, and the price tag becomes legible, just remember who told you so.
     
  16. NJlonghorn

    NJlonghorn 2,500+ Posts

    I do not like that the Democrats put Ellison in such a high position. In the 1990s and early 2000s, he was blatantly anti-Semitic, and I don't think you can just wish that away like many liberals try to do.

    That said, Ellison has explicitly distanced himself from the Nation of Islam and has condemned the group's anti-Semitic positions. He has been a good (but far from perfect) friend of Israel, he has routinely and loudly denounced radical Islamic terrorism, and he has been very supportive of anti-anti-Semitism ("pro-Semitism"?). While I don't see eye to eye with him politically, I think people like him are critical allies if we want to defeat radical Islamic terrorism.

    I'm not ready to say whether the concerns I and others had about a Trump presidency were right or wrong. Trump has confirmed what I said all along, that he himself is not anti-Semitic to any degree. But the jury is still out on some of the people he has surrounded himself with. And the "undercurrent" that was my main point certainly seems to be gathering steam. Who is responsible, and where it will lead, is a wide-open question.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  17. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

  18. Brad Austin

    Brad Austin 2,500+ Posts

    Deez I got this. I'm not a young on his first go-round. You may not trust me on matters of political relevance but this is a realm I assure you I've got covered. :smile1:
     
  19. Mr. Deez

    Mr. Deez Beer Prophet

    :tap: It's OK. I thought I had to the sound judgment to pick out the rare non-crazy Aggie chick too. But if and when you have to pay the price, don't say nobody warned you. :smile1:
     
    • Like Like x 1
  20. iatrogenic

    iatrogenic 2,500+ Posts

    So the "undercurrent" surrounding Trump is gathering steam, but you have no idea who is behind the acts. That makes perfect sense. Conversely, you are now okay with someone that has supported and received support from groups that want to destroy Israel, and kill Jews and "white people".

    Ellison hasn't explicitly distanced himself from Farrakhan, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hezbollah, or any other radical group. In fact, he has accepted funding from those groups indirectly via their fronting organizations in the U.S. He has backed off his radical rhetoric when he saw an opportunity to gain a position to implement his radical views, however.

    He's a "friend of Israel"? Not even close.

    Deep into his 30s, this man, poised to head the Democratic Party, was a spokesman for the Nation of Islam. He publicly spewed anti-Semitism and later in life, as a congressional candidate, knowingly accepted $50,000 in campaign contributions given and raised by Islamic radicals who openly supported Islamic terrorism and were leaders of front groups for Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. His controversial statements and actions date back to the '90s, when he served as a local spokesman for Louis Farrakhan's Nation of Islam movement and raised eyebrows when he publicly claimed in 1995 that Farrakhan "is not an anti-Semite."

    As a congressman in 2012, Ellison voted against Israel on every proposition, resolution, and bill. Shy 11 other congressmen, no one has voted against Israel more than Ellison – five separate votes.

    This past summer, Ellison (aka Keith X. Ellison, aka Keith Hakim, aka Keith Ellison Muhammed) worked to insert anti-Israel positions and language into the 2016 Democratic national platform and to keep pro-Israel planks out. He complained in a Democracy Now! interview that the Israeli "occupation" was to blame for a "humanitarian crisis" and lack of sewage processing in Gaza.
    During the 2014 war with Hamas, Ellison was among eight representatives who voted against funding the Iron Dome anti-missile defense system, which Israel desperately needed due to incessant and indiscriminate incoming rockets from Gaza.
    This past month, the House of Representatives' Ethics Committee opened an investigation into the soon to be chairman of the DNC after Ellison failed to disclose that the Muslim American Society – a group that Muslim Brotherhood members founded to be the "overt arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in the U.S." – paid $13,350 for Ellison to visit Mecca, Saudi Arabia in 2008.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/12/keith_ellison_the_democrats_just_dont_get_it.html#ixzz4a56Fcnav

    Honest question: If Trump had the background of Jewish hate, history of supporting and receiving support from terrorist groups, and associations with Louis Farrakhan and other radicals that X Ellison Muhammed has, what would you think about Trump?

     
    Last edited: Mar 1, 2017
  21. mchammer

    mchammer 10,000+ Posts

    Please take this to the 3:16 board.
     
  22. NJlonghorn

    NJlonghorn 2,500+ Posts

    Don't have time to respond to everything, but I will say this. If Trump had Ellison's history, I would be much more concerned about Trump than I am.

    I don't think Ellison is the devil and I think we need people like him as allies in the war against terror. But I don't think he is a viable candidate for leadership in a major party, much less POTUS. If the presidential vote had been between Trump and Ellison, I would have been a yuge Trump supporter.
     
  23. Mr. Deez

    Mr. Deez Beer Prophet

    The correct term is "bigly."
     
    • Like Like x 1
  24. Brad Austin

    Brad Austin 2,500+ Posts

     
    • Like Like x 1
  25. iatrogenic

    iatrogenic 2,500+ Posts

    That is good news. :clap:
     
  26. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

  27. Phil Elliott

    Phil Elliott 2,500+ Posts

    Am I the only person on earth who correctly heard him say "Big League", not "bigly"? Somebody transcribed this wrong and now "bigly" is repeated as fact. He never said that, no more than Sarah Palin said "I can see Russia from my house" or GWB said "strategery".
     
  28. horninchicago

    horninchicago 10,000+ Posts

    No, I heard it as big league also, but the haters will hate and make him out to be a moron.
     
  29. Mr. Deez

    Mr. Deez Beer Prophet

    How many times do I have to defend or otherwise say good things about Trump before people stop calling me a hater? I make bigly references for two reasons. First, when I heard him say it, he didn't enunciate a concluding "g." It definitely sounded like bigly. Second, "bigly" (if you accept it as a word), actually makes more sense in context than "big league" does.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  30. horninchicago

    horninchicago 10,000+ Posts

    Sorry, I was not referring to you. You are fair in your critiques.
     
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page