One thing to consider is D'onta's lack of receiving yards. As far as yards from scrimmage he ranks third among running backs.
The second highest rusher Pumphrey (SDSU) has more yards from scrimmage (2,113 to 2,103) and they both have 15 TD's.
Boise State's McNichols is tied for first with 2,113 yards from scrimmage but blows both away with 27 total TD's.
This is exactly my point when projecting DF's NFL value. A guy like McNichols has two solid rushing years with high receiving yards in both...
2015: 1,337 rushing, 460 receiving, 26 TD's
2016: 1,663 rushing, 450 receiving, 27 TD's
It's hard to favor a pure rushing back like D'onta higher than McNichols in regards to the pro game when Foreman only caught 7 passes for 75 yards.
Clearly the other guy can rush well too (535 carries, 5.6 ypc), but also provides a dramatically more dangerous receiving threat which is important to many pro offenses.
CBS Sports Draft rankings which is a pretty solid site for draft has McNichols ranked 52 overall (2nd round) and Foreman ranked 76th (2nd/3rd).
When/if they see DF's big body turn in a blistering 40 for his size, I assume that gap will narrow. But he'll still need to show well in receiving drills to prove he's versatile.
Not sure where DF will finish in the Heisman but he's at a disadvantage among some others. He never had the hype train of the UT PR campaign touting his name.
This is a big deal in that race. When a team has a legit contender entering the season they strongly publicize their guy and continue to send marketing materials to voters.
Unfortunately DF never had that advantage entering the season coming off one split carries season with 672 yards. He's in the race all by his own doing.
Next year would be whole other animal. Foreman's name would get mega press and a personalized UT PR campaign which would help his NFL stock as well.
Last edited: Nov 29, 2016