Dumb Political Correctness

Discussion in 'West Mall' started by Mr. Deez, Feb 8, 2012.

  1. Mr. Deez

    Mr. Deez 10,000+ Posts

    For me, it was about 18 years ago, when I was in my early 20s and didn't have good judgement when it came to dating. And the liberal women I dated weren't like the wingnuts we see now. They were basically nice girls - just a little granola and vegetarian, which tends to go with liberalism. Lol.
     
  2. nashhorn

    nashhorn 2,500+ Posts

    Never thought about it in that context before but if ‘liberal’ meant the girls that liked to get high well yeah, they were a lot more fun and not just sex wise, than the ‘never touch the stuff’ stodgy stiffs back in my day. Never thought about it in liberal vs conservative, ah who am I kidding, I never thought about much back then. Peace.
     
  3. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Does kind of look like her
    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
  4. mchammer

    mchammer 2,500+ Posts

    That comparison is unfair to blob fish.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  5. theiioftx

    theiioftx 2,500+ Posts

    I am all for liberals not having sex. Thin the herd.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  6. bystander

    bystander 5,000+ Posts

    A Liberal preaching abstinence... who would have thunk it?
     
  7. Mr. Deez

    Mr. Deez 10,000+ Posts

    Is internet porn considered abstinence?
     
  8. bystander

    bystander 5,000+ Posts

    Abstinence and sex is as defined by our wives or girlfriends. Whatever they think we're doing; that's what we're doing.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  9. Mr. Deez

    Mr. Deez 10,000+ Posts

    Excellent point. And this "sex strike" is so idiotic. Did Alyssa Milano consult her husband about this? It reminds me of the idiotic masturbation bans that some feminists have filed. They're trying to frame abortion as a men vs. women issue, and I understand why. Framing the issue that way forces the identity politics angle, which gets people to shut off their brains and approach the issue emotionally and through the lens of tribalism.

    The problem is that abortion isn't really a men vs. women battle. If you show up at a pro-life rally, you'll see at least as many women as men. It is more of a single, young women and men vs. married, older women and men.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  10. Monahorns

    Monahorns 1,000+ Posts

    I would think feminists would at least want restrictions on female abortions. But at that point you have to be against aborting either gender or you rightfully come off as a villain.
     
  11. ProdigalHorn

    ProdigalHorn 10,000+ Posts

    Faecbook became a partisan left organization a long time ago, but this is basically the gauntlet being thrown down:

     
    Last edited: May 15, 2019 at 1:28 PM
  12. Monahorns

    Monahorns 1,000+ Posts

    I agree that Twitter is biased to the Left but this isn't a good example. The Tweet is available. Facebook is the platform at fault here. And Zuck really is the worst.
     
  13. ProdigalHorn

    ProdigalHorn 10,000+ Posts

    My bad... pulled it off twitter and got my leftist platforms mixed. :D
     
  14. mb227

    mb227 2,500+ Posts

    However, Twitter HAS banned females for saying much of the same thing. I actually have my account in a 'locked' status by Twitter because I appealed a tweet that noted the lack of due process when certain of the trannies whine and snivel about something a woman has posted. It did not even contain content that ran afoul of their rules, but they are ignoring the appeal in the hopes that I just delete the tweet.

    But, making matters worse is that if you appeal one of their claimed objectionable tweets, you cannot even VIEW Twitter while logged in. This makes the tweet in question even more ironic given how I had pointed out the lack of process when it comes to suspensions and removals of content...even worse was that the tweet in question was from mid-November but was not claimed as objectionable for more than five months.

    Content: "@Ovalegal @terristrange probably that nerd dude that was all upset because females wouldn't wax his balls...sadly, he gets the providers to kowtow to his claims of digital copyright infringement without any modicum of due process given to the content writers. Just...POOF...and gone. F**k #Yaniv

    The individual in question is the same one that crows about getting women like Meghan Murphy removed from Twitter and who filed complaints against waxing salons because they wouldn't wax his genitals. The post had followed, as best I recall, people who were describing some content on other platforms that just disappeared with no right of appeal.
     
  15. humahuma

    humahuma 250+ Posts

    God I glad I am not on Twitter
     
    • Like Like x 3
  16. Sangre Naranjada

    Sangre Naranjada Liquor Man

    +1
     
  17. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    • WTF? WTF? x 3
    • poop poop x 1
  18. Clean

    Clean 5,000+ Posts

    Somebody needs to sue the SAT organization. They should only care about right and wrong answers.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  19. Mr. Deez

    Mr. Deez 10,000+ Posts

    • Like Like x 1
  20. Horn6721

    Horn6721 10,000+ Posts

    Trump admin has created a web site for people who have been banned from social media platforms for exercising free speech.Today the White House launched a website for Americans to share their stories on bias from tech companies.
    Tech Bias Story Sharing Tool
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  21. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    I am pretty sure they got the idea from your movie ....
    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  22. Monahorns

    Monahorns 1,000+ Posts

    Didn't Supreme Court rule against racial types of evaluations for admission into Universities? I remember a certain school being caught up in the case.
     
  23. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Sandy-baby really crapped the bed in that sub-genre of SC law.
     
  24. Mr. Deez

    Mr. Deez 10,000+ Posts

    The Fifth Circuit ruled against UT in the Hopwood case back in the mid '90s. The Supreme Court declined to hear that case, but they heard another case involving the University of Michigan in the early 2000s and upheld race-based admissions. UT has been in the Court more recently (2016), and the Court has ruled with UT. However, two new justices have joined the Court since then. What was a 4-3 ruling in favor of affirmative action could easily become a 6-3 ruling against.
     
  25. Phil Elliott

    Phil Elliott 1,000+ Posts

    • Like Like x 2

Share This Page