Dumb Political Correctness

Discussion in 'West Mall' started by Mr. Deez, Feb 8, 2012.

  1. Vol Horn 4 Life

    Vol Horn 4 Life 5,000+ Posts

    That's racist!
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. Mr. Deez

    Mr. Deez 10,000+ Posts

    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  3. mb227

    mb227 2,500+ Posts

    Sadly, too many of the people suffering from TDS don't understand facts...
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    I love how these guys are able to continue to carve out their niche.
    It's tough out there for a satirist.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Hot Hot x 1
  5. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Here's an article about how this odd woman and bad actress manages to cling to the vestiges of her celebrity

     
    Last edited: Aug 6, 2019
  6. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Some MN House Reps have asked the IRS to look into Omar's tax fraud
     
  7. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    heh

     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  8. Horn6721

    Horn6721 10,000+ Posts

    But maybe true.
    She is trying to sell her new album.
     
  9. Phil Elliott

    Phil Elliott 1,000+ Posts

    Kid Rock = Harsh but True.
     
  10. LongestHorn

    LongestHorn 1,000+ Posts

  11. LongestHorn

    LongestHorn 1,000+ Posts

  12. HornHuskerDad

    HornHuskerDad 5,000+ Posts

  13. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Yay Domenic


    [​IMG]
     
    • Like Like x 2
  14. Horn6721

    Horn6721 10,000+ Posts

    San Diego’s city attorney is taking away hundreds of guns from those who shouldn’t have them .
    Under California’s red flag law, enacted in 2014, a law enforcement official or immediate family member can ask a judge to issue a Gun Violence Restraining Order if a gun owner is feared to be a danger to himself or others. If the order is issued — and it almost always is — the gun owner’s weapons will be seized by law enforcement for up to a year. After a year, the restraining order can be renewed.
    In Sacramento, legislation is pending that would expand California’s statute.

    One bill would extend the length of the firearms restraining order from one year to five. The measure, AB 12 by Assemblywoman Jacqui Irwin (D-Thousand Oaks), has passed the Assembly and is in the Senate. Democrats support it. Republicans are opposed .


    Another bill, AB 61, would allow an employer, co-worker or school employee to request a restraining order.
    San Diego's city attorney is taking away hundreds of guns from those who shouldn't have them

    :confused2:
    Absolutely there are people who need weapons taken away
    BUT did I miss the part about due process here?
     
  15. Mr. Deez

    Mr. Deez 10,000+ Posts

    It depends on the specifics. We allow temporary restraining orders (TRO) to be obtained in emergency situations in ex parte proceedings - meaning without the defendant's appearance in court and even without his notice. The key word is "temporary." If you want the TRO to stick long term or permanently, you need an injunction, will requires full due process rights. The defendant has to be served and given the opportunity to appear and defend himself in court. If these GVROs are lasting for 1 or 5 years and are being obtained in ex parte proceedings, I could see a federal court striking them down.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. Horn6721

    Horn6721 10,000+ Posts

    Mr D
    One year does not meet my definition of "temporary"
    And the new bill that passed the Ca house of 5 years without due process ??

    Since the word temporary does not appear on the name of the policy how can they get away with it being for a year?
     
    Last edited: Aug 13, 2019
  17. bystander

    bystander 5,000+ Posts

    Scenario:

    You feel threatened and warn the person you will blow them away if they come to your home. The person who is threatening you goes to court to have your guns removed because you "threatened" them. Then you have to get an attorney and go through the process not to have your guns removed which would make you vulnerable to the original threat which assumes it's not an ex parte hearing as mentioned by Mr. Deez above.

    Far-fetched?
     
    Last edited: Aug 13, 2019
  18. HornHuskerDad

    HornHuskerDad 5,000+ Posts

    Any chance California will secede from the USA? How can we help them do it?
     
  19. Phil Elliott

    Phil Elliott 1,000+ Posts

    Reelecting Trump would be a good start to pushing them over the edge.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  20. Seattle Husker

    Seattle Husker 10,000+ Posts

    FY18 HUD budget is $52B. 31% of their budget goes to Baltimore? Or is Lynn Patton, the former Trump family event planner, pulling from all forms of Federal expenditures/programs to make the number as big as possible? Someone handed Patton that number and it likely came from the White House.
    2018-03_hudbudget_ver.1-01.png
     
  21. Horn6721

    Horn6721 10,000+ Posts

    SH??
    Did you even watch the video?
     
  22. Seattle Husker

    Seattle Husker 10,000+ Posts

    Why would I watch an event planner comment on politics and government expenditures?

    Are you saying JoeFan misquoted Patton?
     
  23. Horn6721

    Horn6721 10,000+ Posts

    No he did not misquote her.
    You are trying to twist what he posted and what she said. Pay attention instead of being disingenous.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  24. mb227

    mb227 2,500+ Posts

    Oh now you are being silly...it is Commiefornia. They don't believe in due process except and unless you are an illegal alien. THEN and ONLY then will they bend over backwards to accommodate your every need...
     
  25. mb227

    mb227 2,500+ Posts

    I'd be happy to contribute to the frackers sending their equipment over and making sure those fault lines were well lubricated...then Commiefornia can just fall off of the map.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  26. Horn6721

    Horn6721 10,000+ Posts

    mb
    Point, :thumbup:
    If you are illegal in Ca they protect you in" sanctuary" and provide legal help
    But Americans entrapped in this policy are denied their 4th Amendment rights for at least a year.

    Yes there are people who should not have guns. Give them due process like any suspected criminal or law breaker.
     
  27. Vol Horn 4 Life

    Vol Horn 4 Life 5,000+ Posts


    If they did they'd build a fence to keep their entire tax paying population from fleeing to the US.
     
  28. Statalyzer

    Statalyzer 10,000+ Posts

    Can they go ahead and do this now?

    Sincerely,
    Austin, TX
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 2
  29. Monahorns

    Monahorns 1,000+ Posts

    Curious, Horn6721, what is the maximum length of time you would consider temporary?
     
  30. Horn6721

    Horn6721 10,000+ Posts

    Mona
    Good question.
    How long should someone suffer a penalty imposed on them without due process? Maybe it should be the same as a person arrested?
    I know this is not a TRO and is imo more serious than telling someone to stay away from another, plus in a TRO isn't the person being restrained notified and allowed an attorney?

    Requiring a reasonable time for due process would get the weapon out of a potentially dangerous person which is what we want but would allow the person accused and the people accusing the person their voice before a judge.
    What Calif is doing is imo pretty extreme.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1

Share This Page