I agree the problem isn't textualism per se but as you said it seems easy for these so called conservatives and liberals to interpret the text anyway they want. It's clear that when when judges followed "original intent" and to a lesser extent Original Meaning (Scalia's version of textualism) this **** didn't happen as often.
The next time a second amendment argument comes to a liberal SCOTUS we're screwed.
Last edited: Jun 16, 2020