Friends of God - HBO

Discussion in 'Quackenbush's' started by RyanUTAustin, Jan 27, 2008.

  1. RyanUTAustin

    RyanUTAustin 1,000+ Posts


     
  2. Anastasis

    Anastasis 1,000+ Posts


     
  3. Hayden_Horn

    Hayden_Horn 1,000+ Posts


     
  4. RyanUTAustin

    RyanUTAustin 1,000+ Posts

    I am simply perplexed by people's unwaivering belief in something so ridiculous.

    The fact that people actually believe that there is a entity looking down on them that judges there actions on earth...then decides if they go to the right or left when they die is mind boggling to me.

    The universe is too immense to be so self absorbed and think that anything you do matters.

    I understand why people need it but it is simply a crutch to help explain the reason we are here.

    Not to mention the books make outrageous claims that people believe...and why?
     
  5. RyanUTAustin

    RyanUTAustin 1,000+ Posts

    Ya, it is coming out on Easter [​IMG]

    A mix between Religion and Ridiculous
     
  6. MilkmanDan

    MilkmanDan 1,000+ Posts


     
  7. Macanudo

    Macanudo 2,500+ Posts


     
  8. HornsInTheHouse

    HornsInTheHouse 500+ Posts

    Comparing deities to Love (or Hate or Jealously, no need to zero in on a single emotion) is totally inaccurate given the nature of the claims. Emotions are functions of our human brains that exist only within our brains. Claims of deities being supposedly independent of our brains is different. These deities supposedly have the power to interact physically with the world, and even create it! Our thoughts cannot do that.

    Religions are claiming the existence of something that exists outside the human mind and interacts with the perceivable universe. At that point it's fair to ask, "How does God interact with the world? How do you know that?"
     
  9. netslave

    netslave 1,000+ Posts


     
  10. Anastasis

    Anastasis 1,000+ Posts


     
  11. HornsInTheHouse

    HornsInTheHouse 500+ Posts


     
  12. Texas

    Texas 250+ Posts

    Trouble is, too many Christians have been practicing religion instead of seeking a relationship with their all-powerful, all-loving God.
     
  13. Anastasis

    Anastasis 1,000+ Posts


     
  14. HornsInTheHouse

    HornsInTheHouse 500+ Posts

    I think we're misunderstanding each other's vocabulary with regards to Love. This conflict is the source of much of the world's poetry. [​IMG]

    But my usage is narrowly restricting it to that which we all know: a personal, human emotion. I have to restrict it to that because this definition is the most universally understood. Your definition appears to require the belief in a deity in order to even discuss it. Mine requires only shared human experience. We could very well be talking about two completely different concepts that share the same spelling, like the two versions of "gay" or "bad" (think 1970s).

    If vocabulary is a barrier I'll use another human emotion, apprehensiveness. I've never heard anyone define a deity as Apprehensiveness. Yet it's as universal and real, if not potent, as love in the human condition. Is there a deity that is responsible for all our apprehensive feelings? Christianity doesn't provide one. No, it is the result of our minds, our contexts and situations, just as love is. I feel Christians have co-opted the great human emotion of love, and it is now a circular definition. "What is love? Love is God. What is God? God is love." [​IMG]
     
  15. Anastasis

    Anastasis 1,000+ Posts

    I understand you POV HitH. I am speaking of love in the sense of agape, as understood by the early Christian movement. The english word really doesn't capture the concept. I guess the best description is selfless love, based on what I understand. I agree that we are not talking about the same thing. I agree with most of the points you make in your last paragraph. I admitted in my post that I don't like the idea of describing God as the source of human emotions. I wouldn't even know where to start with trying to wrap my head around that.
     
  16. netslave

    netslave 1,000+ Posts

    In reply to:


     
  17. LadyHornAustin

    LadyHornAustin 100+ Posts


     
  18. RyanUTAustin

    RyanUTAustin 1,000+ Posts

  19. Anastasis

    Anastasis 1,000+ Posts

    I have a feeling that Ryan's children will be the unfortunate recipients of unavoidable genetic child abuse.
     
  20. RyanUTAustin

    RyanUTAustin 1,000+ Posts


     
  21. netslave

    netslave 1,000+ Posts


     
  22. RyanUTAustin

    RyanUTAustin 1,000+ Posts


     
  23. alden

    alden 1,000+ Posts


     
  24. netslave

    netslave 1,000+ Posts


     
  25. netslave

    netslave 1,000+ Posts


     
  26. RyanUTAustin

    RyanUTAustin 1,000+ Posts


     
  27. Hayden_Horn

    Hayden_Horn 1,000+ Posts

    for both sides, both netslave and ryan, this is like arguing over an algebra problem when one side believes in the concept of "0" and the other does not.

    the disconnect is there, ryan. you refuse to even consider his point of view. he said that a reasonable discussion could not be had if that was the case, and despite some real good posts by netslave, we are still where we were at the beginning.
     
  28. RyanUTAustin

    RyanUTAustin 1,000+ Posts


     
  29. RyanUTAustin

    RyanUTAustin 1,000+ Posts


     
  30. Hayden_Horn

    Hayden_Horn 1,000+ Posts

    see, i'm not even a person of much faith, and i find your comments borderline offensive.

    i know you don't give a ****. but there it is.
     

Share This Page