Of course they don't like it. It's useful to the West and other free countries. If somehow wind could be made viable, they'd find a reason to complain about it too - probably something about all the dead birds. If we could make solar viable, they'd complain about all the indigenous people that we kicked off the land that the panels occupy. There will always be something for them to ***** about.
The US should probably adopt nuclear to achieve 5% of total global emissions and stop there. No one else beyond Europe, Japan, and the US has any intention of lowering CO2 emissions.
And yet the US and EU get about 1,000 more crap for their CO2 emissions than China does. I'd bet my left nut that China funds a huge amount of climate activism and "research."
You bring up a good point. Any company that supports China should get a major hit on their ESG scores if ESG was meant to be real.
But of course, they don't. China is an environmental shitshow, puts people in concentration camps, and uses virtual slave labor, but nobody cares. It just shows that ESG is a bunch of crap.
Oh, she's not that bad. She isn't hot like the other one, but like AOC, her problem isn't her appearance. It's her idiocy.
What a moron! The elites in these “colonized” lands will revolt if we stop doing business with them. Elites in US and Europe are the same breed as elites in Thailand, India, Middle East, etc. Europe can implode and it isn’t going to stop the extraction of resources. The global companies based in Europe will just move to Dubai. BASF is already moving more production out of Europe with a huge new complex in South China.
She MIGHT be a 5 on appearances alone, but like the Dutch chick and AOC, they all turn into -2s as soon as they open their yaps.
But that's what this is really about. It isn't about making things less elitist and sure as hell isn't about the environment. It's about destroying the West. She's doing the bidding of Beijing and Moscow.
Socialism. Never has worked, never will. Might add, when I hear the phrase White Supremacy I know I'm dealing with a political lunatic. The OFF button gets a workout
The term had some meaning when it was primarily used to describe guys like David Duke or the Aryan Brotherhood (meaning actual white supremacists). Nowadays, it's used to describe basically anyone who is remotely favorable to the West and Christianity. In other words, it's meaningless, much like the term "racist."
Perfect example of my point: As the West surges toward electric cars, here's where the unwanted gas guzzlers go — CNN
And of course the article is critical of the West for selling them gas cars rather than of those countries for buying them. Whitey is always the evil party.
Note the article goes out of its way to say Africans have no choice because they are poor. Wait, we have no poor people in the US? Rich white liberals have abandoned the working class.
I think she needs to start her plans with herself and her comrades first. Nothing is stopping her from eliminating all fossil fuels from her life and redistributing all her income.
She’s a moron on multiple levels. Here’s another one: compared to Europe, the Middle East countries are going to act like Texas and India is going to act like the US South. Similar misconstrued ideas led dems to thinking Florida was trending democrat. Oomph! By the way, India and Saudi Arabia are not going to be Russian or Chinese supporting countries unless the US really screws up.
This is one of reasons these idiots keep pulling this crap. Instead of removing and charging them, the police just close the bridge in one of the biggest cities in the world because the motorists are confronting them (in other words, doing what the police should be doing).
