Has a professional company stood behind these analyses? So far, all I've seen are amateur anonymous analyses. The single one that was submitted in the Lin Wood GA court case melted down in glorious fashion when scrutinized.
You only accept information from "approved" sources. That isn't where truth comes from. It comes from whatever source produces it. Your use of labels like "melted down" aren't helpful either. There may have been good reasons why the analysis submitted to the court in the Lin Wood GA case was not accepted. Or it could have been dismissed using sophistry or bias. Plus. I didn't ask you.
I posted a bunch of stuff on this thread. Looked like obvious anomalies which were suspicious in light of comparisons to other states. Then several videos/articles showing that there was probably an algorithm used to shift votes.
LOL! Project Veritas needed to get their piece of the pie. $$$ Lot's of conservative sites and organizations making $$$ on the election steal. DJT is probably disappointed he has to share in the bounty.
Still waiting for the kraken. This is nothing but a money haul on Trumps part. He can use the rubes $ to pay down campaign debt.
I think MI and WI both had huge data dumps that were out of proportion for Biden. Also lots of negative vote shifts against Trump. To me negative vote shifts of any type are a huge red flag for an accounting system.
There are election workers giving sworn affidavits. An impeachment occurred over an "anonymous" whistleblower and hearsay from overheard cell phone calls and crybaby career "diplomats". But, sworn affidavits are sketchy for sure.
Both states were a part of a handful of states that wouldn't allow tabulation of votes to start until election day. Which other states did you compare that waited until the day of election to start counting any votes?
That's the same "Tech Millionaire" that had an intimate relationship with a Russian spy. Hollywood couldn't write a script this crazy.
