Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'West Mall' started by OrangeShogun, Oct 12, 2020.
Dinesh D'Sousa says hello.
5 years probation. 8 months in a halfway house. He was actually doing something illegal and way worse than what Trump did by using straw donors and he still didn't go to prison.
A community confinemment center is not a halfway house. It is closer to a county jail. So technically not prison, but not a halfway house either.
Is D'Sousa the only one who funneled campaign contributions through an intermediary? No. If he had used BLM to funnel money to Biden, he would have been applauded instead of prosecuted.
That report is 1000 pages of no collusion between Trump and Russia. The only collusion shown is between the DNC, the Clinton Campaign, Steele, Perkins Coie, and a few lowlifes at the FBI that have been discredited and terminated.
DJT had this to say at a White House Holiday party last night. The emphasis is mine. It's possible he's pulling the chain of the media which he loves to do to stay relevant but my money is on him announcing his 2024 bid sometime during Biden's Inauguration week.
I may have overstated the "dead to rights" based on a jury trial which can be more easily influenced. Senator John Edwards had 2 hung juries in a similar case where he was paying $$ to a mistress during the 2000 campaign. It sucks but "justice" is different for more powerful people. This is why Hillary got off without even being charged for something a military grunt would spend 10 years in Leavenworth. In this case, is Trump guilty? Yes based on the facts. Can that court case be won? Probably not.
I think Biden would like to the cases to go away. The primary thing he has to gain from a protracted Trump legal battle is the potential that he'd lose access to Twitter if he served jail time. Seriously, a Trump court case could go either way. It distracts Trump from beating on Biden and it potentially exposes a bit more of the financial shenanigans that DJT has fought tooth and nail to hide. Can Trump be more of a martyr than he's already claiming and his supporters giving him credit for?
I'm also not sure Biden is the type to put his finger on the scale in this case, especially if it means going against the extreme members of the party that want to see Trump held accountable.
2016 compared to 2020. CONCEDE already. Biden won by double the amount that Hillary won by. It's up to almost 7,000,000 votes.
When you can't win in court you talk yourself to vict....confirming you lost. For those that don't want to listen to the 45 minute video Trump claims his lawyers submitted all the evidence in court. If his supporters will simply send him some more money I'm certain he'll be able to prove he won and overturn the election.
I said in the summer that Biden could win by +4 nationally and still lose. Since Biden is above that currently and that he basically won by <0.3% each in GA, AZ, WI, and PA, I am emphatically claiming I was right. Imagine Biden winning 51–47 and losing the EC by 10,000 votes collectively.
I never understood the rationale of those who said he could only win by a few points and still lose. He could have run up the score in California, New York, and Illinois even more, racked up a huge popular vote margin, and still lost.
The root cause of the misconception is that I think the media and pollsters underestimate just how much of political outliers those big Democratic states really are compared to the swing states. They think those states are somewhat left of the swing states, and they're actually wingnut left of the swing states.
They are wingnut left of reality, that's the problem.
how long before the DMC gets the talking points out to poo poo this?
So is anyone offering this in court where it can be authenticated or where we can get to the bottom of it?
I think Rudy showed it at the Ga hearing which is not court but is public and being shown nation wide
Doesn't that make you wonder?
The person speaking about the video said they just reviewed it last night. They said they need more time to fully watch the entire chain of events.
Twitter disputes the video. Shouldn't the twitter "fact" checkers have to provide a basis for their decision?
They're getting pretty short on time, and I wonder why it has taken so long to show up.
It was presented to the GA legislature today. The video was only given to the republican attorneys yesterday.
Georgia Video Footage Allegedly Shows Poll Workers Staying Behind, Producing 'Suitcases of Ballots'
I’m leaning to amending the constitution for a) state governors appoint senators as originally written (with state legislature approval?) and 2) house representatives select president and Vice President based on state delegate votes. As such inauguration is moved back to March.
This has been the big problem. Too many press conferences. Not enough putting cases together to actually challenge the outcomes. Also, the best evidence wasn't shown. The server data matched to the time series vote count graphs was the most important. They needed to match that to example ballot records seeing what the condition of the ballots counted at the anomalous events.
But they just kept talking about mail in ballot submission things.
I wonder if they've amended their court paperwork.
The lawyer for Team Trump just said at hearing they would be filing in a Ga court tomorrow.
Just a few minor allegations...nothing to see here!
Dems wish these were minor.
update. 1-44. The kanas state of the 1980’s. Maybe they should hire Bill Snyder.
I should have waited. 1-45