Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'West Mall' started by mchammer, Sep 24, 2019.
Well if he exonerates Trump that would match his original testimony.
Anyone else think of this with Schiff, et al?
But it wouldn't necessarily make him more credible.
Gosh Bubba sorry you’re so busy,,,,,just ribbing you, but I am sorry to hear of your hospitalized daughter - hope she is alright.
If he changed his testimony and goes with the “refreshed” then that makes him lose his credibility due to changing it.
If he goes in and changes it back to his original testimony then it makes him a liar.
Either way Trump wins. It’s Schitt that needs credibility from somewhere because so far he’s struck out with every witness. Once Sondland changed his original testimony he was done.
I know I should accept or reject Vindman's words based on whether they are shown to be accurate or not, and not on him coming across as an egotistical douche, but since he does in fact exude such egotistical douchiness, it makes that difficult to do.
She's good. Thanks! Business is going pretty well. Doing the 1.5 hours in the morning is starting to get old.
I'm reading and laughing at the circus y'all are leading. It's no longer worth my time to debate ignorance so I've taken to private messages with the more educated posters.
To you educated posters = The ones that aren't laughing at me for making an *** out of myself. A real educated poster knows this impeachment is a sham.
So you are going with the “I’m too intelligent for you” argument. If you are so intelligent then why are you a Democrat? Oh.....and you are indeed a Democrat if you want to admit it or not. Something else you won’t admit is that you believed everything Adam Schitt said. That Schitt head let you down again.
Let me guess you are private messaging with Roger35’s circle. It’s where all the liberals go that have been humiliated.
SH says Trump asking for this was wrong.
Remember when someone in the Trump admin questioned the loyalty of Vidman? Maybe it was because of this (though I agree it was done in poor taste and disrespectful to do so):
If there is one direct piece of evidence that PROVES Donald Trump ordered or negotiated a quid pro quo with Ukraine then it would be great to see it.
But there is another fact and this is it: The Left has never accepted Trump's victory and they've been on a mission to impeach from day one. It is OBVIOUS.
Gutfeld on The Five continues to agree with me. Feels this whole thing is a Human Resources issue.
To be fair the libs want to impeach every Republican President. I think they've tried this to every republican for the last 50 years or something like that.
This is my original post on this thread (I started it on Sept 24):
What is this Ukraine thing all about? Didn’t Hillary tried to get campaign info against Trump from Ukrainians? Didn’t Biden pressure Ukraine to stop an investigation due to alleged corruption? Forwarding to today, if Trump presses Ukraine about corruption, that is impeachable? I don’t get it. Or is this a fake issue to get Dems to impeach Trump, something they want to do anyway. If latter is true, doesn’t that signal they don’tthink Warren or Biden can win?
Note the Ukraine impeachment push came one week after the disastrous and farcical Lewandowski testimony before Nadler’s committee on Sept 17.
Watch: Former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski speaks in impeachment hearing after White House limits testimony
All kidding aside, hope and pray for your daughter’s road to better health.
Again, did not see any testimony. I have read multiple updates here, Fox, CNN and Breitbart. Once again, must have been another staff meeting at CNN today. They missed some damning testimony - In favor of Trump.
A quick summary:
How does Schiff know he has not called the whistleblower?
Pence national security advisor Kellogg heard nothing wrong or of concern on the Trump-Zelensky call.
She skips her upward chain to "report" her concerns to someone who would carry the ball to the next yard marker
I think years from now, this will have a Watergate type stench x10. I didn't think the dems were dumb enough to attempt a coup but this is taking that shape.
You don’t think roger stone’s recent conviction might not have something to do with the sudden improvements in memories?
I’m just here representing the devil in absentia.
If someone changes their "story", they toss away their credibility. That pertains to any situation
speaking of the devil
As a Cajun once told me, "if Adam and Eve were Cajun, they'd have cooked the snake and saved us all a lot of grief"
jmo, I think the devil (dems in this case) is cooked