No The success they have had is not an indicator of how they would have dealt with B12 teams apples/oranges
They would have a good shot but I think OSU would still light them up. You contain Martinez, you contain Nebraska, so I'm not so sure they would beat us. We've proven we can hold Martinez.
With OU being as jekyl and hyde.. I think they may have a good shot at it. Also, the cowgirls look to be legit for the first time ever.. Not so sure we can take them this year at their place.
With OU being as jekyl and hyde.. I think they may have a good shot at it. Also, the cowgirls look to be legit for the first time ever.. Not so sure we can take them this year at their place. Nebraska would have def competed for it...
Neb is on the same level as aggie. No match for ou or oSu... The B1G is down at the top. Is there a legitimate top 10 team in the league? Wisky is probably the best team but they may have been hail mary'd right out of the B1G title game now. Mich probably beats neb in AnnArbor and may leave a 3 way tie with MSU and neb in the leper division at 6-2. Looks like about 6 (not including OSU) good but not elite teams overall in the hunt for title with no real favorite. B1G champion will probably be 10-2 and ranked about #10
The only thing that has changed for Nebraska is the conference. They took a B-12 North level of play to the B1G and have been relatively successful as they were in the B-12 North. Until they prove they can hang with the B-12 South champ, whoever that turns out to be, there is no reason to believe that they have suddenly improved from their level of play over the last 10 years.
