Not even Spicer will defend this claim....

Discussion in 'West Mall' started by NJlonghorn, Jan 24, 2017.

  1. iatrogenic

    iatrogenic 2,500+ Posts

    Bubba, the idea is to remove dead people, and people no longer residences of any particular State, from the voting rolls. There should be no complaint about doing so. This would not hurt in the effort to curb voter fraud, and there is no legitimate argument against doing so.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  2. OUBubba

    OUBubba Reluctant and Bullied Sponsor

    I'm supportive of removing dead people from the rolls. I changed my address on my DL and they automatically disenrolled me. I had to go re-register to vote. Seems a little aggressive.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Sangre Naranjada

    Sangre Naranjada Winebibber

    Seems common sense to me. Not aggressive at all.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. Mr. Deez

    Mr. Deez 10,000+ Posts

    Barry, I have to register every year. It isn't that big of a deal.
     
  5. mchammer

    mchammer 5,000+ Posts

    You should have to re-register if you haven’t voted in 5 years.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. Austin_Bill

    Austin_Bill 2,500+ Posts

    I'm guessing Tammany Hall is now the DNC.
     
  7. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

  8. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Even Sean Spicer knows what's up

     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. Monahorns

    Monahorns 2,500+ Posts

    I would prefer internet voting that is linked to a camera shot of your face. With face recognition technology presence can be verified.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    When I first read the top sentence I saw "a camera that will shoot you in the face if you cheat." I was thinking how bold you are
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    Last edited: May 8, 2020
  11. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  12. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

  13. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. mchammer

    mchammer 5,000+ Posts

    The article is from 2019
     
  15. Garmel

    Garmel 2,500+ Posts

    Yeah, I remember the libs/media got the number down from 95,000 to 60,000 and acted like they won the argument.
     
  16. Monahorns

    Monahorns 2,500+ Posts

    mchammer, are you saying there are over 100,000 now?
     
  17. mchammer

    mchammer 5,000+ Posts

    No. The tweet is from May, 2020 but the tweeter is referencing a 2019 article that has been challenged. To the casual user, the tweeter is making it appear this is current information. This is false.
     
  18. I35

    I35 5,000+ Posts

    It’s a good thing that there’s not a statue of limitations for articles to be posted from 6 months ago.
     
  19. Austin_Bill

    Austin_Bill 2,500+ Posts


    Doesn't have to be right now for it to be relative to the discussion. We Americans need to decide the direction of our country not a bunch foreigners. 300 million US citizens and we generally only get a small fraction of those voting in major elections and much less voting in the minor ones.

    This whole thing reminds me of the scene from the movie Gangs of New York where there was so much voter fraud they had more votes than citizens and had to stop because they ran out of ballots. We don't need that, we need a secure count and no way should we let the left dictate the terms of the fight.

    We will lose way too much if that happens. Our constitution will become meaning less, unless you are a member of the communist party errrrr the Democrat party.
     
  20. mchammer

    mchammer 5,000+ Posts

    It’s a tough job monitoring the internet. I would like to see you do it, Mr smart guy.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  21. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    :shrug:
     
  22. mchammer

    mchammer 5,000+ Posts

    Wasn’t this article heavily disputed when it was printed? I don’t know what was the final resolution but for the tweeter to omit this is a lie of omission.
     
  23. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    What was the final purge?
    And why do they always resist purging the voter rolls of the dead?
    I suggest there is only one reason
     
  24. Garmel

    Garmel 2,500+ Posts

    The final purge got it down to about 60,000 if my memory serves me.. After that the lawyers came in and threatened to sue Texas if they decided to try to take any people off the rolls. That was the end of it right there.
     
    Last edited: May 23, 2020
  25. Monahorns

    Monahorns 2,500+ Posts

    And Texas backed down to lawyers? Texas better step back up!
     
  26. I35

    I35 5,000+ Posts

    It’s new when people hear it for the first time. So much fake news that the real stuff doesn’t get heard. Unfortunately the people that would monitor the internet would be the people that allows fake news and blocks the real stuff.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  27. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    She-Jack's campaign surrogates are already "harvesting" mail-in ballots from nursing homes

     
    • WTF? WTF? x 1
  28. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

Share This Page