...why is serving on a board with someone who was a terrorist 40 years ago is worse than marrying someone who was a member of a party whose central purpose is the secession of Alaska from the US (not 40 years ago, but 5), as well as personally participating in said party's conventions from 1994 to 2008. Frankly, I don't make much of either. But, if you want to do the guilt by association game, I don't understand why serving on a non-profit board with someone who was involved in trying to attack the US 40 years ago is so much worse than sleeping with someone trying for the breakaway of about 20% of US land recently (and, actually participating in that activity). oh...and OU sucks!
there is a pattern with BHO that shows his associates to be radicals and liberals..then he denies and deflects the relatiionships.
