Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'On The Field' started by baoklhorn, Jun 25, 2020.
Precisely why VY refused it. It was a tainted trophy by then.
"OU" and "educated" in the same sentence is an oxymoron.
in the end, the vote went another way.....no need for sloppy seconds
the Heisman goes to whoever gets the most votes and that was not Vince.
Bush got the most votes and the only reason he lost the trophy is because of something that happened off the field.
So Vince, great as he was, does not deserve it. He did not get the most votes.
I had the '05 A&M game on yesterday for a bit. Toward the end, James and the other moron were talking about their Heisman votes. They both said VY did not show them enough that DAY compared to what Bush had done against the School For The Blind. So, it all came down to one game, not who had the better season and was actually the team's most valuable player, which I think is supposed to be part of the criteria.
So, for chrissakes, why is this even a continuing topic? VY, and later Colt, was hosed by the "expert" what have have you done this week morons who are allowed to vote.
Bush being a cheater has no bearing on all that and the stupid voters.
I don't think Colt was hosed. 2008 was a really tough choice and there was no single clear-cut right answer. 2009 I wouldn't have voted for Ingram either but Suh deserved it more than anybody. That year was proof that they just might as well make defensive players ineligible for the award because the voters will just never again vote for one.