Poll: Democrat win in Nov bad for Investors

Discussion in 'West Mall' started by Texas_Curl, Jan 14, 2008.

  1. Texas_Curl

    Texas_Curl 100+ Posts

  2. RomaVicta

    RomaVicta 5,000+ Posts

    Any idea of the political and economic breakdown of the advisors' clients? If they fear the revocation of the tax break the rich got from Bush, they are probably right to be.
     
  3. Michtex

    Michtex 1,000+ Posts

    Are the poll respondents the same idiots that were advising people to buy homes with no money down?


     
  4. Ag with kids

    Ag with kids 2,500+ Posts

    Interesting that that's the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank... [​IMG]
     
  5. Texas_Curl

    Texas_Curl 100+ Posts

    michtex

    would those be pre-tax or after-tax returns? cause the only numbers that make a difference is the after tax return.

    hook'em
     
  6. Texoz

    Texoz 1,000+ Posts

    Stock Market durning Clinton's 8 years

    January 4, 1993 3,309
    December 29, 2000 10,787


    Stock Market durning Bush's 7 years

    January 2, 2001 10,646
    January 15, 2008 12,580

    Who wants to bet that the December 31, 2008 market close will be much higher than now? Odds are it will be lower, maybe a lot.
     
  7. RomaVicta

    RomaVicta 5,000+ Posts

    Won't that be on Bush, as far as a president is responsible for the health of the stock market? (If that is your point, sorry to be so dense.)
     
  8. Fried JJ Pickles

    Fried JJ Pickles 1,000+ Posts


     
  9. softlynow

    softlynow 1,000+ Posts

    taxes are going up, Dem or Pub in the WH.
     
  10. Texoz

    Texoz 1,000+ Posts


     
  11. babysdaddy

    babysdaddy 100+ Posts

    ^^^^^

    Or it could be a free market economy that ebbs and flows depending on what does and what doesn't work.

    Also, I guess he didn't have enough on his plate? I'm no Bush lover but you write things like you think he's the smartest person on the planet and he should have seen the subprime mess coming (did you, oh wise one?) yet then constantly point out how stupid and arrogant he is.

    It should not be the role of the government to bail out morons. We, as a country, need to take this on the chin and get our spending habits in line. Don't spend more than you make and don't think your wage is a linear line going up to help you rationalize buying something before you can afford it.
     
  12. Texoz

    Texoz 1,000+ Posts

    In reply to:


     
  13. RomaVicta

    RomaVicta 5,000+ Posts

    Thanks for the clarifications, Texoz. Interesting.
     
  14. Texoz

    Texoz 1,000+ Posts

    I'll also add that the leadership is also lacking on the Democratic side in Congress. Nobody from that bunch really forced the issue on sound fiscal responsibility.
     
  15. dognduckhorn

    dognduckhorn 500+ Posts

    Interesting little visit to the website of the outfit that conducted this poll. A plurality of their respondents might worry about dem damn dems taking over the White House, but their cover text seems to be worried about slowing growth and recession right now:

    https://clients.brinkercapital.com/default.aspx


     
  16. bularry

    bularry 250+ Posts

    Texoz,

    the "anyone could see this mess coming" is just a silly argument.

    a market economy is just what it says. the market set the terms of the loans.

    and please, don't give Bill Clinton credit for the stock market climb in the 90's, or any politician for that matter. credit goes to the technological innovations and advances made by the private sector, nothing the govt did assisted in the growth. it is silly to argu otherwise.

    and I don't agree taxes go up no matter which party gets the white house.
     

Share This Page