Post Left Wing looniness here

@Horn6721 , so should judges just disobey the law? Unless the Legislature changes the law, that's the only alternative.

 

Gotta love public schools.

 

Mr D
I just did not know public indecency required complete exposure of genitals.
I was asking if that same ahole had exposed himself to the 17 yo in public could he ve arrested?

 

Again, the standard of exposure is the same regardless of age.

I don't think it requires the complete exposure. If you just pulled one ball out the bottom of your shorts and showed it off to a bunch of 15 year old girls or adult women, you could still get into trouble. However, there would have to be at least some exposure of the anus or genitals.

 

And on this Plainview story, people need to understand something. The fact that there was a sex act in a first grade class is disturbing. The fact that a teacher either knew about it and did nothing or was so checked out that she didn't know about it is disturbing. But those facts aren't what should really horrify people. What should really horrify people is that the school's first instinct was to cover its ***. It wanted this kept hidden from the public.

 

It is an intent-based offense. He clearly entered the women's area for the purpose of self-gratification.

What I was surprised at was the judge was a DeWine appointee, so presumably Republican.

 

Transgenderism "Confusing People About The Nature Of Reality" And Victimizing Children: Authors | ZeroHedge

 

He exposed himself to gratify himself. Hence the 'any person' element would have been met. And, having previously been reported, he was beyond reckless...

 

But government schools are the biggest employers in rural communities! (that's not aimed at you Deez)

 

But that isn't enough. He must expose his anus or any part of his genitals. If he didn't do that, he's not guilty as a matter of law. Again, it's not the result I'd want, but a judge has to follow the law, not what he wants.

 

And the district acts surprised...

"
Classes have been cancelled for a second day, according to the release. First, Monday’s classes were canceled due to “threats of violence” directed at the school and the recent mass shooting in Allen.

School officials stated they have contacted the Texas Education Agency and the Texas DPS’s Intelligence and Counterterrorism Division. They stated they have received threats against the school district and its educators from across the nation.

“Once we receive feedback from both entities, we will decide on when classes may continue,” the released said.
"
The district should be closed until arrests are made. It's obviously unsafe for first graders.

Plainview ISD working with local police, FBI after claims of sexual assault of 6-year-old

 

Law professor escorted out of classroom by police. WTF!!!!

 

I wish I could read the article better but it looks like that prof wasn't woke

 

If he's tenured, he needs to sue.

 

Colorado Teachers’ Union Passes Anti-Capitalist Resolution, Sparking Outcry From Republicans | ZeroHedge

 

Our country gets loonier every day.
Not sure it can be stopped

 

Just Nuts: History Professor Suspended For Passing Out Candies Marked "HeHim" And "SheHer" | ZeroHedge

 

That will cost him a pharaoh amount.

 

No, it won't. He'll take out student loans for it all. Then he'll set up an income-driven repayment plan (that won't actually reduce the principle) for ten years while working for the university, and the loans will be forgiven under the PSLF Program.

 

I rely on HIC

 

Mr D
I get your point
But you could have let me have a rare moment for me of HF qualified cleverness

 

I feel like we need a Alphabet soup thread. Loony is the barista. Kinda impressed Starbucks didn't say the customer deserved it. Also impressed that misgendering isn't a crime in England.

Starbucks fires trans barista screaming at customer to 'get out' after being misgendered: 'Let go of me' (msn.com)

 

Texas House votes to ban medical transition of children. Here's a link to the record vote. It's mostly along party lines but not entirely.

If you want to see what statesmanship looks like, this is it. A very liberal member from Houston voted with the GOP. She explains her rationale here. (Wish other members did this sort of thing.) Why is it statesman-like? Because she is risking her entire career to do the right thing. She is from a solid blue, urban district, where something like this could get her into real trouble. It will attract national, negative attention and almost guarantee her a well-funded primary opponent. Though she's an incumbent, she hasn't been there for that long, so she isn't overly entrenched. She isn't the only Democrat to vote Yes, but most of the others are from redder districts. (When the bill passed the Senate, no Democrats voted Yes.)

 

This has to be staged. ChatGPT was asked to write a poem about Donald Trump and then Biden

 

All the old men would say, "I fought the Nazis and the commies for this ********? We should have stayed home."

 

Wow. Monster cojones on that lady.