Discussion in 'West Mall' started by Horn6721, Oct 15, 2020.
Looking for the best place to post this.
I'm just gonna set this here.
Never thought I'd have to put Chick-fil-a in the left wing looniness thread, but here we are.
Chick-fil-A faces a conservative revolt
I sit here corrected. The Dodgers have added Christian Faith and Family Day to the schedule. And I just became a Clayton fan.
Dodgers’ Clayton Kershaw disagreed with organization’s decision to honor Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
May as well be an ad for homeschooling. And again, why the desire to talk about sex with kids?
Is this a good time to point out the obvious fact that this "teacher" looks like she ought to have plenty of experience with needing inanimate objects?
A union actually doing something right.
Those aren't hers. Lol.
You're the expert.
Finally. Since the Dodgers catered to the small percent of LGBT folks and they've added Christian Faith night, why not atheist pride night next?
I'm not sure I can claim that. I've never handled a fake set. I'd defer to @Garmel .
I've handled a few fake sets but she's too covered for me to be sure.
I think there are two issues here. First, are those AOC's? Second, are they real? I'm quite sure that they're not hers. It's a Photoshop job. But they obviously belong to somebody. Are they real or fake? They look fake to me. They stand up just a little too high and are too round, as opposed to teardrop.
I simply post a picture of left wing looniness and the thread gets thrown in the gutter. Next thing you know, we will be debating Farrah again.
We're just having a little fun. Lighten up, Frances.
Surely you saw this coming. Can't post what's essentially a boob pic and expect no commentary. Lol.
Since it's photoshopped, for all we know those could be right wing boobs!
I think sarcasm meter recalibration is available at Tolbert’s in June.
I don't see anything wrong with what they're promoting.
What their actual agenda will be is still not known
Did you read the key goals and wording ?
Your don't see anything wrong with DEI?
Deez, believe it or not there has now started some effort to create a "Christian" version of DEI. It is really despicable and coming from powerful people in evangelical circles. Some call them Big Eva.
The way it was worded in the link?No. The way it's executed by other companies, yes
DEI of any flavor is based on critical social justice and is a tool of injustice, theft, and partiality. It should be rejected it addresses "problems" that don't exist.
Yes, but i see nothing in there offensive. I don't mind inclusion, I have no issue with valuing differences. I just don't see a big deal.
"Other's mileage may vary"
Inclusion means exclusion of anyone who is white and/or doesn't celebrate LGBT+, the Great Reset, or total managerial control.
While nice that CFA desn't say 'yay gay,' equity is an offensive term. It means that CFA doesn't care about treating everyone the same. It means CFA wants to treat some differently to get them better outcomes. CFA could have picked a better term than DEI to mean valuing differences. Also no mention of Christ on the DEI page is odd for a company claiming to be so Christian.