As civil rights grew more accepted throughout the nation, basing a general election strategy on appeals to "states' rights", which some would have believed opposed civil rights laws, would have resulted in a national backlash. The concept of "states' rights" was considered by some to be subsumed within a broader meaning than simply a reference to civil rights laws.
[2][3] States rights became seen as encompassing a type of
New Federalism that would return local control of race relations.
[58] Republican strategist
Lee Atwater discussed the Southern Strategy in a 1981 interview later published in
Southern Politics in the 1990s by Alexander P. Lamis.
[59][60][61][62]
Atwater: As to the whole Southern strategy that Harry Dent and others put together in 1968, opposition to the Voting Rights Act would have been a central part of keeping the South. Now [Reagan] doesn't have to do that. All you have to do to keep the South is for Reagan to run in place on the issues he's campaigned on since 1964 [...] and that's fiscal conservatism, balancing the budget, cut taxes, you know, the whole cluster...
Questioner: But the fact is, isn't it, that Reagan does get to the
Wallace voter and to the racist side of the Wallace voter by doing away with legal services, by cutting down on
food stamps?
Atwater: Y'all don't quote me on this. You start out in 1954 by saying, "
N, n, n." By 1968 you can't say "n"—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like
forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me—because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "N, n."
Click to expand...