Has anyone read it? I just saw this posted on one of the comments sections of the current Israeili-Gaza fighting articles: In reply to:
Well put, Dionysus. I can't say with any authority if these statistics and conclusions are true, but it somehow "feels" true.
Kinda funny that Bosnia was included on the list. Since, you know, Muslims were the victims of anti-Islamic extremists. But I get his overall point. With the exceptions of UAE and Turkey, the list also looks like a ladder of socioeconomic status from wealthy to poor. While Islam may be seen as a front for political upheaval and change, I think wealth (or lack thereof) drives political upheaval and change even more. Would those countries and their percentages still be included if they magically had a higher standard of living? Is it Islam that's keeping them from having money?
https://www.gorgiaspress.com/BOOKSHOP/pc-55606-92-massacres-resistance-protectors-muslim-christian-relations-in-eastern-anatolia-during-world-war-ibrby-david-gaunt.aspx WWI Muslims make these guys in Iraq today look like pikers as described by this post referencing the book above: