The above two posts are typical, weak arguments repeatedly used by goofy liberals.
"everyone is oversimplifying the women's march"- This crap is stated with a sense of superiority toward those that disagree with him. Only he can understand the complexity. You are too simple. Other examples: "I don't want to get into the weeds"
"Trump would be best not to poke the bear by defunding planned parenthood"- In other words, and disregarding facts, "you will suffer if you disagree with me, the all knowing liberal"
You'd have to disregard the multitude of sexual harassment claims against him, the Billy Bush tape, the comments on the Howard Stern show, the treatment of Carly Fiorina and others to believe that he doesn't have a misogynistic view of women. Ivanka Trump is one of the only arguments against this and in this case you can clearly see that family trumps other views. ."- the liberal can take anecdotal incidents that favor his arguments and extrapolate them to the universe, but the repeated actions of Trump hiring women and supporting his daughter that counter the lib's argument are either ignored or relegated to a "one-off', family related situation. Ignoring facts are a favorite tactic of liberals. For instance, what happened to all of the women that made unfounded sexual harassment claims against Trump at the end of the Presidential campaign? They disappeared as soon as Trump said he was going to sue them. Has a court found Trump guilty of sexual harassment? No, but that doesn't stop the liberal from making the "all or nothing" argument that every thought Trump has about all women involves prejudice and that he will sexually harass all women.
-In this case all facts concerning the specifics of the women's soccer team's complaints are ignored, as are the wholly disingenuous claims concerning a lack of "women's rights" existing somewhere in the U.S., or that women's rights are being denied. Top off that tactic with "your a misogynist because you don't agree with my views", despite the fact that his views are baseless and illegitimate. Buried in the lib's argument is the implication that he is for women's rights and you are not.
-
Like x 2
Last edited: Feb 22, 2017